Smith v. HSS

1:20-cv-00224NddJan 11, 2021

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
Matthew A. Smith, 	)
)
Plaintiff, 	) 	ORDER
)
vs. 	)
)
HSS, 	) 	Case No. 1:20-cv-224
)
Defendant. 	)
Plaintiff initiated this action pro se and in forma pauperis on December 7, 2020, asserting
claims against his apparent employer for discrimination and negligence. (Doc. Nos. 1 and 4). Judge
Traynor subsequently referred this matter to the Magistrate Judge for initial review pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).
On December 22, 2020, I issued a report recommending that this action be dismissed without
prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction given that plaintiff and defendant have no discernable
connection to this district and the conduct at issue is not alleged to have occurred in this district.
(Doc. No. 6). Plaintiff’s response to the report and recommendation is due by January 11, 2021.
On January 7, 2021, Plaintiff filed a “Motion for Stay of Execution.” He requests that this
matter be stayed indefinitely while he gets his finances in order, assembles his case, and searches
for legal representation.
For the reasons I articulated in the report and recommendation, courts in this district lack
personal jurisdiction. Staying this matter indefinitely is unlikely to benefit plaintiff. Rather, it could
arguably be to his detriment given his limited means and reality that his chances of persuading this
court that is has personal jurisdiction are beyond remote. His energies and resources are better spent
1
Case 1:20-cv-00224-DMT-CRH Document 8 Filed 01/11/21 Page 1 of 2
in a district where a court would have personal jurisdiction. Accordingly, plaintiff’s request for a
stay (Doc. No. 7) is DENIED. As it unlikely that plaintiff will receive notice of this decision until
well after his deadline for objecting to the report and recommendation has lapsed, his deadline for
filing such objections shall be extended until January 25, 2021.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 11th day of January, 2021.
/s/ Clare R. Hochhalter
Clare R. Hochhalter, Magistrate Judge
United States District Court
2
Case 1:20-cv-00224-DMT-CRH Document 8 Filed 01/11/21 Page 2 of 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.