Pederson v. John Deere Electronic Solutions

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
Jason Robert Pederson, also known as 	)
Katheryn Pederson, 	)
)
Plaintiff, 	) 	ORDER ADOPTING ORDER
) 	AND RECOMMENDATION
vs. 	)
) 	Case No. 3:20-cv-51
John Deere Electronic Solutions, 	)
)
Defendant. 	)
______________________________________________________________________________
Before the Court is an Order and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Alice R.
Senechal on February 23, 2021, wherein Judge Senechal denied the Plaintiff’s motion to withdraw her
consent to proceed before a magistrate and judge and recommended the undersigned review the Order.
See Doc. No. 69. The Court has carefully reviewed the Order and Recommendation, the relevant case
law, and the entire record, and finds the Order and Recommendation to be persuasive. 	While 28
U.S.C. § 636(c)(4) permits a party to withdraw its consent to a magistrate judge upon demonstrating
extraordinary circumstances, the Plaintiff has failed to make such a showing here. Accordingly, the
Court ADOPTS the Order and Recommendation (Doc. No. 69) in its entirety and DENIES the
Plaintiff’s motion to withdraw consent (Doc. No. 68).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 25th day of February, 2021.
/s/ Peter D. Welte
Peter D. Welte, Chief Judge
United States District Court
1
Case 3:20-cv-00051-ARS Document 70 Filed 02/25/21 Page 1 of 1