3:25-cv-00155•Case Name in Social Security Case - Unavailable
Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA EASTERN DIVISION Maurice J., Plaintiff, v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:25-cv-155 ORDER Plaintiff Maurice J. initiated this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of the Social Security Commissioner’s final decision denying his application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. Plaintiff Maurice J. filed a brief requesting reversal of the Commissioner’s final decision and remand for further consideration. Doc. 11. In response, the Commissioner moved for remand. Doc. 13. The Commissioner states Plaintiff does not oppose the Commissioner’s motion to remand. The Commissioner requests remand to conduct further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Under sentence four of § 405(g), the Court can affirm, modify, or reverse the decision of the Commissioner, with or without remanding the case for rehearing. A sentence four remand is proper when the Court makes a substantive ruling regarding the correctness of the Commissioner’s decision and remands the case in accordance with such ruling. Buckner v. Apfel, 213 F.3d 1006, 1010 (8th Cir. 2000). Here, the parties agree the evidence is insufficient to support the Commissioner’s findings and further proceedings are necessary. Remand under sentence four is therefore appropriate. It is ORDERED that the Commissioner’s unopposed motion for remand (Doc. 13) Case 3:25-cv-00155-PDW-ARS Document 14 Filed 11/13/25 Page 1 of 2
2 and Plaintiff Maurice J.'s request for remand (Doc. 11) are GRANTED, and the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. JUDGMENT SHALL BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated this 13th day of November, 2025. /s/ Peter D. Welte Peter D. Welte, Chief Judge United States District Judge Case 3:25-cv-00155-PDW-ARS Document 14 Filed 11/13/25 Page 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.