Robinson v. Cordonier

8:23-cv-00535NedFeb 24, 2026

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
KIRK ROBINSON,
Plaintiff,
vs.
MICHAEL CORDONIER,
Defendant.
8:23CV535
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss, which the Court
liberally construes as a motion to voluntarily dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
41. Filing 18. Rule 41(a)(2) provides that an action may be dismissed at the plaintiff’s request
“on terms that the court considers proper.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). Here, Plaintiff simply asks
the Court to “dismiss this case.” Filing 18. While the defendant has filed an answer and the
Court recently entered a progression order, this case is still in the early stages of litigation. Upon
consideration, and there being no objection from the defendant,
IT IS ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff’s request for dismissal of this action, Filing 18, is granted. Accordingly,
this matter is dismissed.
2. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and
Order.
Dated this 24th day of February, 2026.
BY THE COURT:
___________________________
Brian C. Buescher
United States District Judge
8:23-cv-00535-BCB-PRSE Doc # 19 Filed: 02/24/26 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID #
<pageID>

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.