USA v. Nolde

1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
vs.
BRYCE A. NOLDE,
Defendant.
8:24-CR-23
ORDER REGARDING COURT’S DRAFT
JURY INSTRUCTIONS AND VERDICT
FORM
This matter is before the Court in preparation for a jury trial set to begin on Monday, January
26, 2026. Attached to this order are the Court’s draft jury instructions and a draft verdict form. The
parties should note that the Court has utilized model jury instruction language where appropriate.
The parties should be prepared to discuss Instruction 1 at the pretrial conference on Monday, January
26, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. That instruction will need to be given to the jury on January 26. The remaining
instructions will be discussed during at least one jury instruction conference that the Court will set
toward the end of the trial. During all jury instruction conferences, the Court will hear the parties’
objections to the draft jury instructions and draft verdict form. However, the opportunity to object
is not an invitation to “wordsmith” the instructions. Merely “preferring” different language is not a
ground for an objection. Any objections raised during the jury instruction conferences must be based
on expected and identified evidence in the case. The objecting attorney must provide supporting
legal authority for the objection and must propose alternative language. If the party has no such
authority, the party is expected to be prepared and to acknowledge the lack of authority on the record
8:24-cr-00023-BCB-RCC Doc # 179 Filed: 01/23/26 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID #
<pageID>

2
during the jury instruction conference. The parties are of course welcome to point out any
typographical errors in the draft instructions or draft verdict form.
With regard to any requested instruction that the Court has not included in its draft
instructions, if a party wishes to object on the basis that such instruction will not be given, the party
seeking the additional instruction is ordered to provide the Court any legal authority as to why the
law requires such instruction to be given to the jury. If no legal authority exists requiring such
instruction to be given, the party is expected to acknowledge the lack of authority on the record.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the parties will be permitted to raise objections to the Court’s draft
jury instructions and draft verdict form during the jury instruction conference or conferences, but
any objection must be based on expected and identified evidence in the case, supported by legal
authority, and accompanied by proposed alternative language.
Dated this 23rd day of January, 2026.
BY THE COURT:
_________________________
Brian C. Buescher
United States District Judge
8:24-cr-00023-BCB-RCC Doc # 179 Filed: 01/23/26 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID #
<pageID>