8:25-cr-00044•USA v. McDougald et al
Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KEITH E. McDOUGALD and DEMETRIUS N. HUNTER, Defendants. 8:25CR44 ORDER This matter is before the Court upon the government’s Motion to Dismiss Forfeiture Allegation (Filing No. 57) of the Indictment (Filing No. 1) regarding the following firearms: a. Sig Sauer P220 .45 cal. Handgun; b. Glock 26 9mm handgun; c. Anderson Manufacturing AM-15 multi-caliber rifle; d. Norinco SKS 7.62x39 cal. Rifle; e. Cobrayo MI 1/9 9mm handgun; and f. Anderson Manufacturing AM-15 multi-caliber rifle, all seized by law enforcement officers on or about between April 15 and September 24, 2024. As the above-described firearms were purchased with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (“ATF”) funds during an undercover operation and, as the purchaser of the firearms, the ATF will destroy the firearms, no judicial forfeiture is necessary. Upon careful review of the government’s motion and the record in this case, the Court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, 8:25-cr-00044-RFR-RCC Doc # 58 Filed: 12/01/25 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # <pageID>
IT IS ORDERED: 1. The government’s Motion to Dismiss Forfeiture Allegation (Filing No. 57) is granted. 2. The Forfeiture Allegation of the Indictment is dismissed. Dated this 1st day of December 2025. BY THE COURT: Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. Chief United States District Judge 8:25-cr-00044-RFR-RCC Doc # 58 Filed: 12/01/25 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # <pageID>
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.