Baldi v. John T. Broderick, Jr., et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
John A. Baldi
v. Case No. 04-CV-466-PB
John T. Broderick, Jr., et al.
O R D E R
On September 21, 2005, I issued a Memorandum and Order
declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Ronald and
Gail Brown’s counterclaims. As a result, I dismissed the
counterclaims without prejudice.
John Baldi argues that this ruling is erroneous because the
Browns invoked the court’s diversity jurisdiction rather than its
supplemental jurisdiction. If the Browns agree with Baldi’s
contention, they shall, on or before October 28, 2005, file a
motion to reconsider the September 21, 2005 Memorandum and Order
to the extent that it dismisses their counterclaims.
SO ORDERED.
/s/Paul Barbadoro
Paul Barbadoro
United States District Judge
October 19, 2005
Case 1:04-cv-00466-PB Document 75 Filed 10/19/05 Page 1 of 2

cc: John A. Baldi, pro se
Daniel J. Mullen, Esq.
Brian J.S. Cullen, Esq.
Charles Russell, Esq.
John A. Curran, Esq.
Case 1:04-cv-00466-PB Document 75 Filed 10/19/05 Page 2 of 2