1:09-cr-00088•USA v. Hernandez et al
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE United States of America, Plaintiff v. Case No. 09-cr-88-01//03/05/07-SM Juan Garcia Hernandez, Marco Garcia, Ciro Lopez Garcia and Adolfo Casas, Defendants O R D E R Defendant Tomas Cruz’s motion to continue the trial is granted (document no. 116). Trial/Jury Selection has been rescheduled for April 6, 2010 at 9:30 a.m. Evidence will commence the following week on Monday, April 12, 2010, at 9:00 a.m. The objection was orally withdrawn by Attorney Kennedy at the final pretrial conference held on February 9, 2010. It is anticipated by the parties that two defendants (represented by Attorneys Gleason and Kennedy) will proceed with trial as scheduled. All defendants, however, are to be prepared to go forward with trial on the assigned date absent earlier dispositions The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the defendants the reasonable time necessary for effective Case 1:09-cr-00088-PB Document 124 Filed 02/09/10 Page 1 of 2
preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the circumstances. SO ORDERED. ______________________ Steven J. McAuliffe Chief Judge February 9, 2010 cc: Michael Iacopino, Esq. Donald A. Kennedy, Esq. Andrew M. Kennedy, Esq. James D. Gleason, Esq. James P. O’Rourke, Esq. Richard Monteith, Esq. Terry Ollila, AUSA U.S. Marshal U.S. Probation 2 Case 1:09-cr-00088-PB Document 124 Filed 02/09/10 Page 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.