Widi v. Strafford County et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
David J. Widi, Jr.
v.
Strafford County, et al.
Civil No. 13-cv-536-SM
O R D E R
No objections having been filed, I herewith approve the
Reports and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Andrea K.
Johnstone dated June 18, 2015, for the reasons set forth therein
(document nos. 44 and 45). Defendants’ Motion for Summary
Judgment (document no. 25) is hereby denied. Plaintiff’s
Motion for Summary Judgment (document no. 32) is denied without
prejudice.
“‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to
the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district
court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on
appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617
F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of
Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see
also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir.
1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection
to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).
Case 1:13-cv-00536-SM Document 47 Filed 07/17/15 Page 1 of 2

SO ORDERED.
____________________________
Steven J. McAuliffe
United States District Judge
Date: July 17, 2015
cc: David J. Widi, Jr., pro se
Corey M. Belobrow, Esq.
Case 1:13-cv-00536-SM Document 47 Filed 07/17/15 Page 2 of 2