Stile v. US Marshals Service, et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
James tile
v.
U.S. Marshals Service, et al.
Case No. 15-cv-494-SM
O R D E R
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K.
Johnstone dated May 9, 2016, for the reasons set forth therein.
“‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the
magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court
and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on
appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617
F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of
Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see
also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir.
1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection
to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).
SO ORDERED.
____________________________
Steven J. McAuliffe
United States District Judge
Date: June 27, 2016
Case 1:15-cv-00494-SM Document 14 Filed 06/27/16 Page 1 of 2

cc: James Stile pro se
Corey Belobrow, Esq.
Case 1:15-cv-00494-SM Document 14 Filed 06/27/16 Page 2 of 2