Coleman v. State of New Hampshire

1:16-cv-00498NhdApr 30, 2018

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Richard Coleman
v.
State of New Hampshire, et al.
Case No. 16-cv-498-LM
O R D E R
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K.
Johnstone dated April 3, 2018, and deny Coleman’s motion to amend
(doc. no. 61), and deny as moot Coleman’s motion to dismiss
Dronsfield’s objection to the motion to amend (doc. no. 71).
“‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the
magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court
and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on
appeal.’” 	School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617
F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of
Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see
also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir.
1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection
to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).
____________________________
Landya B. McCafferty
United States District Judge
Date: April 30, 2018
cc: Richard Coleman, pro se
Matthew Vernon Burrows, Esq.
Charles P. Bauer, Esq.
Case 1:16-cv-00498-LM Document 91 Filed 04/30/18 Page 1 of 1

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.