Kiniry v. Carroll, et al

1:17-cv-00038NhdSep 8, 2017

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Aaron Kiniry
v.
Lt. Carroll, et al.
Case No. 17-cv-38-LM
O R D E R
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K.
Johnstone dated August 17, 2017, for the reasons set forth
therein. 	“‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections
to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district
court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on
appeal.’” 	School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617
F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of
Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see
also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir.
1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection
to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).
Plaintiff’s request for preliminary injunctive relief
contained within his complaint is hereby denied without
prejudice.
Case 1:17-cv-00038-LM Document 5 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 2
SO ORDERED.
____________________________
Landya B. McCafferty
United States District Judge
Date: September 8, 2017
cc: 	Aaron Kiniry, pro se
Case 1:17-cv-00038-LM Document 5 Filed 09/08/17 Page 2 of 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.