Paige et al v. FCI Berlin, Warden et al

1:18-cv-00670NhdSep 10, 2018

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Lamont Paige, and
Kevin Whitaker
v.
FCI-Berlin, Warden, Robert Hazlewood,
and FNU Feliciano, Chaplain, FCI-Berlin
Case No. 18-cv-670-SM
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K.
Johnstone dated August 8, 2018, for the reasons set forth
therein. Plaintiff Paige’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction is
hereby denied.
“‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to
the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district
court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on
appeal.’” 	School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617
F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of
Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see
also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir.
1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection
to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).
SO ORDERED.
____________________________
Steven J. McAuliffe
United States District Judge
Date: September 10, 2018
Case 1:18-cv-00670-SM Document 14 Filed 09/10/18 Page 1 of 2
cc: 	Lamont E. Paige, pro se
Kevin Whitaker, pro se
T. David Plourde, AUSA
Case 1:18-cv-00670-SM Document 14 Filed 09/10/18 Page 2 of 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.