1:18-cv-00670•Paige et al v. FCI Berlin, Warden et al
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Lamont Paige, and Kevin Whitaker v. FCI-Berlin, Warden, Robert Hazlewood, and FNU Feliciano, Chaplain, FCI-Berlin Case No. 18-cv-670-SM ORDER No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated August 8, 2018, for the reasons set forth therein. Plaintiff Paige’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction is hereby denied. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). SO ORDERED. ____________________________ Steven J. McAuliffe United States District Judge Date: September 10, 2018 Case 1:18-cv-00670-SM Document 14 Filed 09/10/18 Page 1 of 2
cc: Lamont E. Paige, pro se Kevin Whitaker, pro se T. David Plourde, AUSA Case 1:18-cv-00670-SM Document 14 Filed 09/10/18 Page 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.