Roosevelt v. AT&T

1:18-cv-00927NhdDec 21, 2018

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Theodore Roosevelt
v.
AT&T
Case No. 18-cv-927-JL
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K.
Johnstone dated October 16, 2018 . “‘[O]nly those issues fairly
raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject
to review in the district court and those not preserved by such
objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v.
United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010)
(quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d
271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-
Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice,
failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will
waive the right to appeal).
____________________________
Joseph N. Laplante
United States District Judge
Date: December 21, 2018
cc: Theodore Roosevelt
Case 1:18-cv-00927-JL Document 5 Filed 12/21/18 Page 1 of 1

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.