Roberts v. FCI Berlin

1:20-cv-00618NhdApr 22, 2022

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Phillip Roberts
v.
Warden, FCI Berlin
Case No. 20-cv-618-SE
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K.
Johnstone dated March 23, 2022 (doc. no 17). Accordingly, the
Warden’s motion to dismiss (doc. no. 14) is granted. The clerk
shall enter judgment and close this case.
“‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to
the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district
court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on
appeal.’” Sch. Union No. 37 v. United Nat’l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d
554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quotation omitted); see United States
v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper
notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's
report waives the right to appeal district court’s order).
SO ORDERED.
____________________________
Samantha D. Elliott
United States District Judge
Date: April 22, 2022
Case 1:20-cv-00618-SE Document 18 Filed 04/22/22 Page 1 of 2
cc: Phillip Roberts, pro se
Seth R. Aframe, Esq.
Case 1:20-cv-00618-SE Document 18 Filed 04/22/22 Page 2 of 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.