Pitt v. FCI Berlin, Warden

1:22-cv-00156NhdNov 17, 2022

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Luis Pitt
v.
FCI Berlin, Warden
Case No. 22-cv-156-SM
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Endorsed
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone
dated October 27, 2022, for the reasons set forth therein. 	“‘[O]nly
those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's
report are subject to review in the district court and those not
preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” 	School Union
No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010)
(quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271,
275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792
F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a
specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to
appeal).
The clerk of court shall enter judgment and close the case.
So Ordered.
____________________________
Steven J. McAuliffe
United States District Judge
Date: November 17, 2022
cc: 	Luis Pitt, pro se
Case 1:22-cv-00156-SM Document 6 Filed 11/17/22 Page 1 of 1

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.