Acosta-Reyes v. FCI Berlin, Warden

1:23-cv-00096NhdFeb 7, 2024

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Luis Acosta-Reyes
v.
FCI Berlin
Case No. 1:23-cv-96-PB-AJ
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Endorsed
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone
dated January 10, 2024, and grant the motion for summary judgment
(Doc. No. 5). 	The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment and
close the case. 	“‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections
to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court
and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’”
School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st
Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848
F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-
Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to
file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right
to appeal).
____________________________
Paul J. Barbadoro
United States District Judge
Date: February 7, 2024
cc: Luis Acosta-Reyes, pro se
Counsel of Record
/s/Paul Barbadoro
Case 1:23-cv-00096-PB-AJ Document 8 Filed 02/07/24 Page 1 of 1

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.