Valencia Campaz v. FCI Berlin, Warden

1:23-cv-00556NhdSep 10, 2024

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Weimer Valencia Campaz
v.
FCI Berlin, Warden
Case No. 23-cv-556-LM-TSM
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and
Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Talesha L. Saint-Marc dated July
22, 2024, dismissing this case, without prejudice, for failure to
prosecute. In addition, the motion to dismiss (document 5) is denied
as moot. 	“‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the
magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and
those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’”
School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st
Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848
F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-
Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to
file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right
to appeal).
____________________________
Landya B. McCafferty
United States District Judge
Date: September 10, 2024
cc: Weimer Valencia Campaz, pro se
Raphael Katz, Esq.
Case 1:23-cv-00556-LM-TSM Document 6 Filed 09/10/24 Page 1 of 1

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.