Ritchie v. FCI Berlin, Warden

1:24-cv-00016NhdMay 28, 2024

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Jamaro J. Ritchie
v.
FCI Berlin, Warden
Case No. 24-cv-16-JL-TSM
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and
Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Talesha L. Saint-Marc dated April
24, 2024. 	“‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to
the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court
and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’”
School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st
Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848
F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-
Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to
file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right
to appeal).
____________________________
Joseph N. Laplante
United States District Judge
Date: May 28, 2024
cc: 	Jamaro J. Ritchie, pro se
Michael T. McCormack, AUSA
Case 1:24-cv-00016-JL-TSM Document 7 Filed 05/28/24 Page 1 of 1

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.