1:25-cv-00110•Moore v. FCI Berlin, Warden
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Brian Edward Moore v. FCI Berlin, Warden Case No. 25-cv-110-LM-AJ ORDER No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated February 19, 2026. For the reasons explained therein, Warden’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 4) is granted. Moore’s cross-motions (Doc. Nos. 16, 20-21, 24-25) are denied. The clerk may enter judgment and close the case. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia- Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). ____________________________ Landya B. McCafferty United States District Judge Date: March 16, 2026 cc: Brian Edward Moore, pro se Counsel of Record Case 1:25-cv-00110-LM-AJ Document 30 Filed 03/16/26 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.