1:25-cv-00302•Roosevelt v. Ellis
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Theodore Roosevelt v. Sarah Ellis Case No. 25-cv-302-JL-TSM ORDER No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Talesha L. Saint-Marc dated December 3, 2025. “[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.” Rivera-Aponte v. Gomez Bus Line, Inc., 62 F.4th 1, 10 (1st Cir. 2023) (quoting Sch. Union No. 37 v. United Nat’l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010)); see also Santos-Santos v. Torres- Centeno, 842 F.3d 163, 168 (1st Cir. 2016) (“[P]arties who fail to file objections to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation lose their right to appellate review.”). ____________________________ Joseph N. Laplante United States District Judge Date: February 9, 2026 cc: Theodore Rossevelt, pro se Case 1:25-cv-00302-JL-TSM Document 5 Filed 02/09/26 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.