1:25-cv-00428•DeMaria v. NH Judicial Branch Administrative Office of the Courts et al
DeMaria v. NH Judicial Branch Administrative Office of the Courts et al
1:25-cv-00428NhdJan 28, 2026
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Timothy D. DeMaria v. NH Judicial Branch Administrative Office of the Courts Case No. 25-cv-428-JL ORDER No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated January 12, 2026. For the reasons explained therein, the plaintiff’s request for entry of default and default judgment (Doc. No. 9) is denied. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia- Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). ____________________________ Landya B. McCafferty United States District Judge Date: January 28, 2026 Cc: Timothy D. DeMaria, pro se Counsel of Record Case 1:25-cv-00428-LM-AJ Document 18 Filed 01/28/26 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.