1:26-cv-00112•Waite v. Burke
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Richard A. Waite v. Captain FNU Burke et al. Case No. 26-cv-112-LM-TSM ORDER No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Talesha L. Saint-Marc dated August 20, 2026. “[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.” Rivera-Aponte v. Gomez Bus Line, Inc., 62 F.4th 1, 10 (1st Cir. 2023) (quoting Sch. Union No. 37 v. United Nat’l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010)); see also Santos-Santos v. Torres-Centeno, 842 F.3d 163, 168 (1st Cir. 2016) (“[P]arties who fail to file objections to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation lose their right to appellate review.”). Mr. Waite’s request for preliminary injunctive relief (docs. 2 and 7) is denied as moot, without prejudice to his ability to seek similar relief in the future should circumstances so warrant. ____________________________ Landya B. McCafferty United States District Judge Date: September 22, 2026 cc: Richard A. Waite, pro se Counsel of Record Case 1:26-cv-00112-LM-TSM Document 35 Filed 09/22/26 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.