1:26-cv-00162•Mills v. Bluth
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Anthony Mills v. Arlene Bluth Case No. 26-cv-162-TSM ORDER No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Talesha L. Saint-Marc dated March 12, 2026. For the reasons explained therein, this case is dismissed. The clerk shall enter judgement and close this case. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). ____________________________ Samantha D. Elliott Chief Judge Date: April 10, 2026 cc: Anthony Mills, pro se Case 1:26-cv-00162-SE-TSM Document 4 Filed 04/10/26 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.