1:12-bk-12020•Residential Capital, LLC
Full text
1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re: RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL, LLC, et al. Debtors. NOT FOR PUBLICATION Case No. 12-12020 (MG) Jointly Administered MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SUSTAINING DEBTORS’ OBJECTIONS TO PROOFS OF CLAIM AND AMENDED PROOFS OF CLAIM FILED BY CERTAIN PLAINTIFFS IN CALIFORNIA LITIGATION Before the Court are two claims objections filed by the Debtors in these chapter 11 cases: (1) the Debtors’ Objection to Proofs of Claim filed by Certain Plaintiffs in California Litigation (the “First Objection,” ECF Doc. # 4200), and (2) the Debtors’ Objection to Amended Proofs of Claim Filed by Certain Plaintiffs in California Litigation (the “Second Objection,” ECF Doc. # 6130, and together with the First Objection, the “Objections”). The Second Objection is supported by the Declaration of Deanna Horst (the “Horst Decl.,” ECF Doc. # 6130-4). Through the Objections, the Debtors seek to disallow and expunge the proofs of claim listed on “Schedule A” to this Memorandum Opinion and Order (the “California Litigation Claims”), filed by sixty- one individuals (the “California Litigation Claimants”), on the grounds that the California Litigation Claims either fail to state a claim against the Debtors or were filed as improper post bar date amendments. BACKGROUND On May 14, 2012 (the “Petition Date”), each of the Debtors filed a voluntary petition for relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. These chapter 11 cases are being jointly administered pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 1015(b). On August 29, 2012, the Court entered an Order (the “Bar Date Order,” ECF Doc. # 1309) establishing November 9, 2012 at 5:00 p.m. 12-12020-mg Doc 6439 Filed 02/06/14 Entered 02/06/14 15:55:16 Main Document Pg 1 of 18
2 (Prevailing Eastern Time) as the deadline for filing proofs of claim by virtually all creditors against the Debtors (the “General Bar Date”), and prescribing the form and manner for filing proofs of claim. On November 7, 2012, the Court entered an Order extending the General Bar Date to November 16, 2012 at 5:00 p.m. (Prevailing Eastern Time). (ECF Doc. # 2093.) On November 9, 2012, the California Litigation Claimants filed claims (the “Original Claims”) against a number of Debtor entities. Each of the Original Claims asserted an unsecured claim in the amount of $1,300,000 for “Contingent Fraud Claim in litigation,” referring to ongoing litigation (the “District Court Litigation”) in the United States District Court, Central District of California – Western Division (the District Court). The Original Claims referenced an amended complaint (the “Amended Complaint”) filed in the District Court, which asserted causes of action against certain Debtor and non-debtor entities. Each of the Original Claims (and the Amended Complaint) alleged the following causes of action: (1) fraudulent concealment pursuant to California Civil Code (“Civil Code”) sections 1572, 1709, and 1710; (2) intentional misrepresentations pursuant to Civil Code sections 1572, 1709, and 1710; (3) negligent misrepresentations pursuant to Civil Code sections 1572, 1709, and 1710; (4) unfair competition pursuant to California Business and Professions Code section 17200; (5) wrongful foreclosure pursuant to Civil Code section 2924; and (6) improper influence over appraiser pursuant to Civil Code section 1090.5. The Debtors filed an objection to the Original Claims on July 10, 2013, asserting that the Original Claims failed to state a claim against any of the Debtors. (See generally First Objection.) The Debtors argued in the First Objection that the Amended Complaint—the basis for the Original Claims—failed to: (1) satisfy basic federal pleading standards, (2) plead a basis for derivative liability, (3) state any fraud-based claim, and (4) sufficiently allege claims for 12-12020-mg Doc 6439 Filed 02/06/14 Entered 02/06/14 15:55:16 Main Document Pg 2 of 18
3 wrongful foreclosure and improper influence over an appraiser. The deadline to respond to the First Objection was August 9, 2013 (the “Response Deadline”). None of the California Litigation Claimants filed a timely response to the First Objection, but on August 9, 2013—the day of the Response Deadline—fifty-eight of the California Litigation Claimants filed proofs of claim (the “Amended Claims”) solely against Residential Capital, LLC (“ResCap”), each in the amount of $1,300,000. The stated basis for each of the Amended Claims is “Claims, including fraud related to mortgage origination.” In support of the Amended Claims, the California Litigation Claimants attached a 250-page Amended Complaint in Support of Amended Proof of Claim (the “Second Amended Complaint”). The Second Amended Complaint asserts five causes of action, divided into twenty-four “counts,” including: (1) fraudulent concealment, (2) intentional misrepresentation, (3) negligent misrepresentation, (4) negligence, (5) unfair, unlawful, and fraudulent business practices, (6) price fixing in violation of the Sherman Act, (7) improper collection of debt after electing to foreclose, (8) rescission of contract and/or restitution based on grounds of fraud and/or unconscionability, (9) breach of contract, (10) breach of the Crier Rule under California law, (11) unfair debt collection practices, and (12) wrongful foreclosure. Although the Second Amended Complaint appears to raise new legal theories for recovery, the alleged facts on which these claims are based are identical to those on which the Original Claims were based, and counsel for the California Litigation Claimants represented to the Court that the nature of the two sets of claims are the same. (See Hr’g Tr. Aug. 28, 2013 at 25:10–15.) On August 20, 2013—eleven days after the Response Deadline—counsel for the California Litigation Claimants filed the Hairston, et al. Creditors’ Opposition to Debtors’ Objection to Proofs of Claim Filed by Certain Plaintiffs in California Litigation (the 12-12020-mg Doc 6439 Filed 02/06/14 Entered 02/06/14 15:55:16 Main Document Pg 3 of 18
4 “Response,” ECF Doc. # 4758). In the Response, the California Litigation Claimants’ counsel asserts that the Debtors’ First Objection was rendered moot upon the filing of the Amended Claims and the Second Amended Complaint in support. On August 26, 2013, the Debtors sent a letter to the Court asserting that the Amended Claims were improper post-bar date amendments and that they should therefore be disallowed and expunged. On August 28, 2013, the Court held a hearing on the First Objection and directed that the parties agree to a scheduling order with respect to briefing whether the Amended Claims were proper amendments and addressing the underlying merits of the Amended Claims. On November 27, 2013, the Court entered the Scheduling Order For Objection to California Litigation Claims (ECF Doc. # 5965) requiring: (1) the Debtors to file any objection to the Amended Claims on or before December 17, 2013, (2) the California Litigation Claimants to respond on or before January 23, 2014, and (3) the Debtors to file a reply on or before February 6, 2014, with a hearing to be held on February 20, 2014. The Debtors filed the Second Objection on December 16, 2013, arguing that (1) the Amended Claims should be disallowed as improper post-bar date amendments to the Original Claims, and (2) even if the Amended Claims are not expunged as untimely amendments, the Amended Claims fail to state a basis for liability on the part of ResCap, largely for the same reasons set forth in the First Objection, and also because ResCap neither originated nor serviced any of the California Litigation Claimants’ loans. As of the date of this Order, the California Litigation Claimants did not file a response to the Second Objection, and their time to do so has expired. 12-12020-mg Doc 6439 Filed 02/06/14 Entered 02/06/14 15:55:16 Main Document Pg 4 of 18
5 DISCUSSION Section 501(a) of the Bankruptcy Code provides that “[a] creditor . . . may file a proof of claim” to claim an interest in a debtor’s bankruptcy estate. 11 U.S.C. § 501(a). “The proof of claim, if filed in accordance with section 501 and the pertinent Bankruptcy Rules, constitutes prima facie evidence of the validity and amount of the claim under Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3001(f) and Bankruptcy Code section 502(a).” 4 C OLLIER ON B ANKRUPTCY ¶ 502.02[3][f] (Alan N. Resnick & Henry J. Sommer eds., 16th ed. rev. 2013). Section 502(a) provides that a claim or interest, properly filed, “is deemed allowed, unless a party in interest . . . objects.” 11 U.S.C. § 502(a). If an objection refuting at least one of the claim’s essential allegations is asserted, the claimant has the burden to demonstrate the validity of the claim. See In re Oneida Ltd., 400 B.R. 384, 389 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2009); In re Adelphia Commc’ns Corp., Case No. 02-41729 (REG), 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 660, at *15 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Feb. 20, 2007); In re Rockefeller Ctr. Props., 272 B.R. 524, 539 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2000). Bankruptcy Code section 502(b)(1) provides that a claim may not be allowed to the extent that “such a claim is unenforceable against the debtor and property of the debtor, under any agreement or applicable law.” 11 U.S.C. § 502(b)(1). Claims objections have a shifting burden of proof. Correctly filed proofs of claim “constitute prima facie evidence of the validity and amount of the claim . . . . To overcome this prima facie evidence, an objecting party must come forth with evidence which, if believed, would refute at least one of the allegations essential to the claim.” In re Reilly, 245 B.R. 768, 773 (2d Cir. B.A.P. 2000). The objecting party is required to produce evidence equal in force to that provided by the claimant to rebut the presumption of the claimant’s prima facie case. In re Allegheny Intern., Inc., 954 F.2d 167, 173–74 (3d Cir. 1992) (“In practice, the objector must 12-12020-mg Doc 6439 Filed 02/06/14 Entered 02/06/14 15:55:16 Main Document Pg 5 of 18
6 produce evidence which, if believed, would refute at least one of the allegations that is essential to the claim’s legal sufficiency.”). Once this is done, the burden then shifts back to the claimant to produce additional evidence to prove the validity of the claim by a preponderance of the evidence. Id. at 174. The Original Claims, when filed, were entitled to prima facie validity of the asserted claims. The Debtors, through the First Objection, refuted the essential elements of each one of the causes of action asserted in the Amended Complaint and the Original Claims. The burden then shifted back to the California Litigation Claimants to produce additional evidence to prove the validity of their claims by a preponderance of the evidence. Rather than properly respond to the First Objection, however, the California Litigation Claimants filed the Amended Claims, well after the General Bar Date had passed. In their late-filed Response, the California Litigation Claimants asserted that the First Objection was rendered moot by the fling of the Amended Claims. In the Second Circuit, amendment to a claim is freely allowed where the purpose is to cure a defect in the claim as originally filed, to describe the claim with greater particularity, or to plead a new theory of recovery on the facts set forth in the original claim. However, the court must subject post bar date amendments to careful scrutiny to assure that there was no attempt to file a new claim under the guise of amendment. Integrated Res., Inc. v. Ameritrust Co., N.A. (In re Integrated Res., Inc.), 157 B.R. 66, 70 (S.D.N.Y. 1993) (citations omitted). Courts apply a two-step inquiry when considering whether to allow post bar date amendments to proofs of claim. See Midland Cogeneration Venture Ltd. P’ship v. Enron Corp. (In re Enron Corp.), 419 F.3d 115, 133 (2d Cir. 2005); In re Barquet Grp.Inc., 477 B.R. 454, 464 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2012), aff’d, 477 B.R. 454 (S.D.N.Y. 2012). First, the court must 12-12020-mg Doc 6439 Filed 02/06/14 Entered 02/06/14 15:55:16 Main Document Pg 6 of 18
7 determine “whether there was a timely assertion of a similar claim or demand evidencing an intention to hold the estate liable.” Enron, 419 F.3d at 133 (quotation omitted). A claim satisfies this first prong if it: “1) corrects a defect of form in the original claim; 2) describes the original claim with greater particularity; or 3) pleads a new theory of recovery on the facts set forth in the original claim.” Id. (quoting In re McLean Indus., Inc., 121 B.R. 704, 708 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1990)). If this “relation back” inquiry is satisfied, courts then examine whether it would be equitable to allow the amendment. Id.; Integrated Res., 157 B.R. at 70. Courts consider the following five equitable factors in determining whether to allow an amendment: (1) undue prejudice to opposing party; (2) bad faith or dilatory behavior on the part of the claimant; (3) whether other creditors would receive a windfall were the amendment not allowed; (4) whether other claimants might be harmed or prejudiced; and (5) the justification for the inability to file the amended claim at the time the original claim was filed. Integrated Res., 157 B.R. at 70 (citation omitted); Enron, 419 F.3d at 133. “The critical consideration is whether the opposing party will be unduly prejudiced by the amendment.” Integrated Res., 157 B.R. at 70 (citation omitted). The Court need not decide, however, whether it would be proper to allow the Amended Claims. Even if the Court were to allow the California Litigation Claimants to submit their Amended Claims, the Court finds that the Debtors, through the Second Objection, raised sufficient legal arguments to rebut the presumptive validity of the Amended Claims. Once again, the burden shifted to the California Litigation Claimants to produce additional evidence to prove the validity of their claims by a preponderance of the evidence. The California Litigation Claimants failed to respond and therefore failed to carry this burden. For this reason, the Court sustains the Second Objection on the grounds that the Amended Claims fail to state a basis for 12-12020-mg Doc 6439 Filed 02/06/14 Entered 02/06/14 15:55:16 Main Document Pg 7 of 18
8 liability against the Debtors. For the avoidance of doubt, the Court also sustains the First Objection, to the extent that the California Litigation Claimants might seek to prosecute the Original Claims. CONCLUSION Therefore, for the reasons explained above, the First Objection and the Second Objection are SUSTAINED. All of the claims listed on Schedule A, attached to this Memorandum Opinion and Order, are hereby DISALLOWED AND EXPUNGED with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 6, 2014 New York, New York _____/s/Martin Glenn_______ MARTIN GLENN United States Bankruptcy Judge 12-12020-mg Doc 6439 Filed 02/06/14 Entered 02/06/14 15:55:16 Main Document Pg 8 of 18
SCHEDULE A Claims Asserted Against Executive Trustee Services, LLC Claim No. Claimant Name Claim No. Claimant Name 3432 Alex Ibarra 3179 Mary Serrano 3473 Brenda Mella 3167 Mesbel Mohamoud 3422 Brian Foote 3153 Michael Brown 3524 Carolyn Hairston 3143 Michael Man 3122 Cecilia Chaube 3125 Michael Moultrie 2982 Christina Palbicke 3113 Olan Ross 3416 Christine Petersen 3100 Patrick Gaston 3402 Claudinette Brown 3092 Phyllis McCrea 3255 David Cruz 3081 Regina Faison 3062 Deborah Albritton 3075 Rick Albritton 3002 Evelyn Ross 3061 Rick Ewald 3015 Florastene Holden 3046 Robin Gaston 2911 Franco Soro 3039 Rodelina Santos 3395 Gary Johnson 3028 Rosa Rodriguez 3201 Genevie Cabang 3007 Salvador Barajas 3386 Gloria Portillo 2981 Sarah Sebagh 3378 Gregory Buck 2994 Shirley Kaplan 3369 Gricelda Ruano 2969 Terrell Sullivan 3360 Henry Completo 2955 Veronica Grey 3353 Ignacio Rodriguez 2946 Victor Pazos 3343 Irma Laredo 2939 William Mimiaga 3159 Joellyn Johnson 2930 Willie Gilmore 3330 Joselito Mella 2922 Yesenia Cruz 3321 Judy Lim 3315 Julio Del Cid 2899 Julio Gonzalez 3304 Jun O. Santos 3294 Khalil Subat 3247 Lisa Simonyi 3286 Lois Elisa Jordan 3276 Magdalena Avila 3269 Manija Subat 3241 Manuela Badilla 3223 Marcia Willoughby 3216 Marco Badilla 3206 Maria Barajas 3194 Maria Elena Del Cid 3188 Martin Kassowitz 12-12020-mg Doc 6439 Filed 02/06/14 Entered 02/06/14 15:55:16 Main Document Pg 9 of 18
Claims Asserted Against GMAC Mortgage, LLC Claim No. Claimant Name Claim No. Claimant Name 3435 Alex Ibarra 3185 Martin Kassowitz 3470 Brenda Mella 3174 Mary Serrano 3425 Brian Foote 3163 Mesbel Mohamoud 3118 Cecilia Chaube 3157 Michael Brown 2991 Christina Palbicke 3141 Michael Man 3413 Christine Petersen 3130 Michael Moultrie 3403 Claudinette Brown 3116 Olan Ross 3257 David Cruz 3107 Patrick Gaston 3078 Deborah Albritton 3090 Phyllis McCrea 3006 Evelyn Ross 3080 Regina Faison 3020 Florastene Holden 3069 Rick Albritton 2907 Franco Soro 3058 Rick Ewald 3397 Gary Johnson 3048 Robin Gaston 3230 Genevie Cabang 3037 Rodelina Santos 3388 Gloria Portillo 3030 Rosa Rodriguez 3376 Gregory Buck 3010 Salvador Barajas 3371 Gricelda Ruano 2979 Sarah Sebagh 3362 Henry Completo 3000 Shirley Kaplan 3351 Ignacio Rodriguez 2968 Terrell Sullivan 3341 Irma Laredo 2957 Veronica Grey 3169 Joellyn Johnson 2948 Victor Pazos 3327 Joselito Mella 2941 William Mimiaga 3325 Judy Lim 2932 Willie Gilmore 3313 Julio Del Cid 2921 Yesenia Cruz 2901 Julio Gonzalez 2902 Julio Gonzalez 3302 Jun O. Santos 3296 Khalil Subat 3245 Lisa Simonyi 3284 Lois Elisa Jordan 3274 Magdalena Avila 3267 Manija Subat 3252 Manuela Badilla 3225 Marcia Willoughby 3214 Marco Badilla 3205 Maria Barajas 3196 Maria Elena Del Cid 12-12020-mg Doc 6439 Filed 02/06/14 Entered 02/06/14 15:55:16 Main Document Pg 10 of 18
Claims Asserted Against GMAC-RFC Holding Company, LLC Claim No. Claimant Name Claim No. Claimant Name 3430 Alex Ibarra 3190 Martin Kassowitz 3476 Brenda Mella 3181 Mary Serrano 3420 Brian Foote 3170 Mesbel Mohamoud 3533 Carolyn Hairston 3154 Michael Brown 3108 Cecilia Chaube 3147 Michael Man 2989 Christina Palbicke 3123 Michael Moultrie 3418 Christine Petersen 3110 Olan Ross 3409 Claudinette Brown 3097 Patrick Gaston 3262 David Cruz 3094 Phyllis McCrea 3053 Deborah Albritton 3085 Regina Faison 2997 Evelyn Ross 3066 Rick Albritton 3011 Florastene Holden 3064 Rick Ewald 2908 Franco Soro 3044 Robin Gaston 3393 Gary Johnson 3042 Rodelina Santos 3234 Genevie Cabang 3022 Rosa Rodriguez 3383 Gloria Portillo 3003 Salvador Barajas 3381 Gregory Buck 2980 Sarah Sebagh 3366 Gricelda Ruano 2986 Shirley Kaplan 3357 Henry Completo 2965 Terrell Sullivan 3347 Ignacio Rodriguez 2953 Veronica Grey 3345 Irma Laredo 2952 Victor Pazos 3135 Joellyn Johnson 2936 William Mimiaga 3335 Joselito Mella 2928 Willie Gilmore 3319 Judy Lim 2919 Yesenia Cruz 3317 Julio Del Cid 2897 Julio Gonzalez 3307 Jun O. Santos 3291 Khalil Subat 3249 Lisa Simonyi 3289 Lois Elisa Jordan 3278 Magdalena Avila 3272 Manija Subat 3238 Manuela Badilla 3229 Marcia Willoughby 3219 Marco Badilla 3204 Maria Barajas 3198 Maria Elena Del Cid 12-12020-mg Doc 6439 Filed 02/06/14 Entered 02/06/14 15:55:16 Main Document Pg 11 of 18
Claims Asserted Against Home Connects Lending Services, LLC Claim No. Claimant Name Claim No. Claimant Name 3437 Alex Ibarra 3184 Martin Kassowitz 3467 Brenda Mella 3177 Mary Serrano 3427 Brian Foote 3160 Mesbel Mohamoud 3521 Carolyn Hairston 3150 Michael Brown 3112 Cecilia Chaube 3139 Michael Man 2987 Christina Palbicke 3131 Michael Moultrie 3411 Christine Petersen 3119 Olan Ross 3406 Claudinette Brown 3105 Patrick Gaston 3263 David Cruz 3088 Phyllis McCrea 3086 Deborah Albritton 3079 Regina Faison 3009 Evelyn Ross 3071 Rick Albritton 3023 Florastene Holden 3055 Rick Ewald 2913 Franco Soro 3051 Robin Gaston 3399 Gary Johnson 3035 Rodelina Santos 3231 Genevie Cabang 3032 Rosa Rodriguez 3390 Gloria Portillo 3016 Salvador Barajas 3374 Gregory Buck 2977 Sarah Sebagh 3373 Gricelda Ruano 2993 Shirley Kaplan 3364 Henry Completo 2963 Terrell Sullivan 3349 Ignacio Rodriguez 2959 Veronica Grey 3338 Irma Laredo 2950 Victor Pazos 3172 Joellyn Johnson 2943 William Mimiaga 3333 Joselito Mella 2934 Willie Gilmore 3324 Judy Lim 2915 Yesenia Cruz 3312 Julio Del Cid 2904 Julio Gonzalez 3300 Jun O. Santos 3298 Khalil Subat 3243 Lisa Simonyi 3282 Lois Elisa Jordan 3280 Magdalena Avila 3266 Manija Subat 3261 Manuela Badilla 3228 Marcia Willoughby 3212 Marco Badilla 3209 Maria Barajas 3199 Maria Elena Del Cid 12-12020-mg Doc 6439 Filed 02/06/14 Entered 02/06/14 15:55:16 Main Document Pg 12 of 18
Claims Asserted Against Homecomings Financial, LLC Claim No. Claimant Name Claim No. Claimant Name 3431 Alex Ibarra 3187 Martin Kassowitz 4159 Brenda Mella 3180 Mary Serrano 3421 Brian Foote 3168 Mesbel Mohamoud 3517 Carolyn Hairston 3151 Michael Brown 3124 Cecilia Chaube 3145 Michael Man 2978 Christina Palbicke 3126 Michael Moultrie 3417 Christine Petersen 3111 Olan Ross 3404 Claudinette Brown 3098 Patrick Gaston 3254 David Cruz 3093 Phyllis McCrea 3059 Deborah Albritton 3083 Regina Faison 3001 Evelyn Ross 3067 Rick Albritton 3013 Florastene Holden 3063 Rick Ewald 2906 Franco Soro 3045 Robin Gaston 3394 Gary Johnson 3040 Rodelina Santos 3236 Genevie Cabang 3026 Rosa Rodriguez 3385 Gloria Portillo 3005 Salvador Barajas 3379 Gregory Buck 2973 Sarah Sebagh 3368 Gricelda Ruano 2992 Shirley Kaplan 3359 Henry Completo 2967 Terrell Sullivan 3354 Ignacio Rodriguez 2954 Veronica Grey 3344 Irma Laredo 2945 Victor Pazos 3161 Joellyn Johnson 2938 William Mimiaga 3336 Joselito Mella 2929 Willie Gilmore 3320 Judy Lim 2923 Yesenia Cruz 3316 Julio Del Cid 2898 Julio Gonzalez 3305 Jun O. Santos 3293 Khalil Subat 3248 Lisa Simonyi 3287 Lois Elisa Jordan 3277 Magdalena Avila 3270 Manija Subat 3240 Manuela Badilla 3222 Marcia Willoughby 3217 Marco Badilla 3207 Maria Barajas 3193 Maria Elena Del Cid 12-12020-mg Doc 6439 Filed 02/06/14 Entered 02/06/14 15:55:16 Main Document Pg 13 of 18
Claims Asserted Against Residential Capital, LLC Claim No. Claimant Name Claim No. Claimant Name 3434 Alex Ibarra 3152 Michael Brown 3472 Brenda Mella 3142 Michael Man 3423 Brian Foote 3129 Michael Moultrie 3525 Carolyn Hairston 3115 Olan Ross 3120 Cecilia Chaube 3101 Patrick Gaston 2984 Christina Palbicke 3091 Phyllis McCrea 3414 Christine Petersen 3076 Regina Faison 3405 Claudinette Brown 3068 Rick Albritton 3256 David Cruz 3060 Rick Ewald 3073 Deborah Albritton 3047 Robin Gaston 3004 Evelyn Ross 3038 Rodelina Santos 3018 Florastene Holden 3029 Rosa Rodriguez 2910 Franco Soro 3019 Salvador Barajas 3396 Gary Johnson 2975 Sarah Sebagh 3202 Genevie Cabang 2996 Shirley Kaplan 3387 Gloria Portillo 2970 Terrell Sullivan 3377 Gregory Buck 2956 Veronica Grey 3370 Gricelda Ruano 2947 Victor Pazos 3361 Henry Completo 2940 William Mimiaga 3352 Ignacio Rodriguez 2931 Willie Gilmore 3342 Irma Laredo 2924 Yesenia Cruz 3166 Joellyn Johnson 6893 Deborah Albritton 3328 Joselito Mella 6894 Christine Petersen 3326 Judy Lim 6895 Gloria Portillo 3314 Julio Del Cid 6896 Brenda Mella 2900 Julio Gonzalez 6897 Ignacio Rodriguez 3303 Jun O. Santos 6898 Rosa Rodriguez 3295 Khalil Subat 6899 Khalil Subat 3246 Lisa Simonyi 6900 Manija Subat 3285 Lois Elisa Jordan 6901 Maria Barajas 3275 Magdalena Avila 6902 Brian Foote 3268 Manija Subat 6903 Salvador Barajas 3251 Manuela Badilla 6904 Julio Gonzalez 3224 Marcia Willoughby 6905 Michael Man 3215 Marco Badilla 6906 Phyllis McCrea 3208 Maria Barajas 6907 Yesenia Cruz 3195 Maria Elena Del Cid 6908 Julio Del Cid 3186 Martin Kassowitz 6909 Veronica Grey 3176 Mary Serrano 6910 David Cruz 3164 Mesbel Mohamoud 6911 Manuela Badilla 12-12020-mg Doc 6439 Filed 02/06/14 Entered 02/06/14 15:55:16 Main Document Pg 14 of 18
Claim No. Claimant Name Claim No. Claimant Name 6912 Rick Albritton 6938 Carolyn Hairston 6913 Marco Badilla 6939 Robin Gaston 6914 Victor Pazos 6940 Claudinette Brown 6915 Alex Ibarra 6941 Regina Faison 6916 Christina Palbicke 6942 Rick Ewald 6917 Martin Kassowitz 6943 Florastene Holden 6918 Michael Moultrie 6944 Losi Elisa Jordan 6919 Joselito Mella 6945 Jun O. Santos 6920 Mesbel Mohamoud 6946 Rodelina Santos 6921 Cecilia Chaube 6947 Sarah Sebagh 6922 Irma Laredo 6948 Evelyn Ross 6923 Joellyn Johnson 6949 Olan Ross 6924 Shirley Kaplan 6950 Gricelda Ruano 6925 Magdalena Avila 6926 Michael Brown 6927 Gary Johnson 6928 Gregory Buck 6929 Marcia Willoughby 6930 Henry Completo 6931 Judy Lim 6932 Terrell Sullivan 6933 Genevie Cabang 6934 Maria Elena Del Cid 6935 Mary Serrano 6936 Willie Gilmore 6937 Lisa Simonyi 12-12020-mg Doc 6439 Filed 02/06/14 Entered 02/06/14 15:55:16 Main Document Pg 15 of 18
Claims Asserted Against Residential Funding Company, LLC Claim No. Claimant Name Claim No. Claimant Name 3429 Alex Ibarra 3189 Martin Kassowitz 3478 Brenda Mella 3182 Mary Serrano 3424 Brian Foote 3171 Mesbel Mohamoud 3523 Carolyn Hairston 3155 Michael Brown 3128 Cecilia Chaube 3146 Michael Man 2976 Christina Palbicke 3136 Michael Moultrie 3419 Christine Petersen 3109 Olan Ross 3401 Claudinette Brown 3102 Patrick Gaston 3260 David Cruz 3096 Phyllis McCrea 3056 Deborah Albritton 3084 Regina Faison 2999 Evelyn Ross 3074 Rick Albritton 3027 Florastene Holden 3065 Rick Ewald 2909 Franco Soro 3043 Robin Gaston 3392 Gary Johnson 3041 Rodelina Santos 3233 Genevie Cabang 3024 Rosa Rodriguez 3384 Gloria Portillo 3012 Salvador Barajas 3380 Gregory Buck 2972 Sarah Sebagh 3367 Gricelda Ruano 2990 Shirley Kaplan 3358 Henry Completo 2966 Terrell Sullivan 3355 Ignacio Rodriguez 2961 Veronica Grey 3346 Irma Laredo 2944 Victor Pazos 3137 Joellyn Johnson 2937 William Mimiaga 3332 Joselito Mella 2925 Willie Gilmore 3318 Judy Lim 2918 Yesenia Cruz 3309 Julio Del Cid 2896 Julio Gonzalez 3306 Jun O. Santos 3292 Khalil Subat 3250 Lisa Simonyi 3288 Lois Elisa Jordan 3273 Magdalena Avila 3271 Manija Subat 3239 Manuela Badilla 3221 Marcia Willoughby 3218 Marco Badilla 3203 Maria Barajas 3192 Maria Elena Del Cid 12-12020-mg Doc 6439 Filed 02/06/14 Entered 02/06/14 15:55:16 Main Document Pg 16 of 18
Claims Asserted Against Residential Funding Real Estate Holdings, LLC Claim No. Claimant Name Claim No. Claimant Name 3438 Alex Ibarra 3191 Martin Kassowitz 3477 Brenda Mella 3173 Mary Serrano 3428 Brian Foote 3158 Mesbel Mohamoud 3520 Carolyn Hairston 3148 Michael Brown 3104 Cecilia Chaube 3138 Michael Man 2974 Christina Palbicke 3134 Michael Moultrie 3410 Christine Petersen 3121 Olan Ross 3408 Claudinette Brown 3103 Patrick Gaston 3253 David Cruz 3095 Phyllis McCrea 3050 Deborah Albritton 3087 Regina Faison 2995 Evelyn Ross 3072 Rick Albritton 3025 Florastene Holden 3054 Rick Ewald 2905 Franco Soro 3052 Robin Gaston 3400 Gary Johnson 3034 Rodelina Santos 3235 Genevie Cabang 3033 Rosa Rodriguez 3391 Gloria Portillo 3014 Salvador Barajas 3382 Gregory Buck 2971 Sarah Sebagh 3365 Gricelda Ruano 2988 Shirley Kaplan 3356 Henry Completo 2962 Terrell Sullivan 3348 Ignacio Rodriguez 2960 Veronica Grey 3337 Irma Laredo 2951 Victor Pazos 3132 Joellyn Johnson 2935 William Mimiaga 3331 Joselito Mella 2926 Willie Gilmore 3322 Judy Lim 2916 Yesenia Cruz 3311 Julio Del Cid 2895 Julio Gonzalez 3308 Jun O. Santos 3299 Khalil Subat 3242 Lisa Simonyi 3290 Lois Elisa Jordan 3279 Magdalena Avila 3264 Manija Subat 3237 Manuela Badilla 3226 Marcia Willoughby 3220 Marco Badilla 3211 Maria Barajas 3200 Maria Elena Del Cid 12-12020-mg Doc 6439 Filed 02/06/14 Entered 02/06/14 15:55:16 Main Document Pg 17 of 18
Claims Asserted Against Residential Mortgage Real Estate Holdings, LLC Claim No. Claimant Name Claim No. Claimant Name 3436 Alex Ibarra 3149 Michael Brown 3469 Brenda Mella 3140 Michael Man 3426 Brian Foote 3133 Michael Moultrie 3529 Carolyn Hairston 3117 Olan Ross 3114 Cecilia Chaube 3106 Patrick Gaston 2985 Christina Palbicke 3089 Phyllis McCrea 3412 Christine Petersen 3077 Regina Faison 3407 Claudinette Brown 3070 Rick Albritton 3258 David Cruz 3057 Rick Ewald 3082 Deborah Albritton 3049 Robin Gaston 3008 Evelyn Ross 3036 Rodelina Santos 3021 Florastene Holden 3031 Rosa Rodriguez 2912 Franco Soro 3017 Salvador Barajas 3398 Gary Johnson 2983 Sarah Sebagh 3232 Genevie Cabang 2998 Shirley Kaplan 3389 Gloria Portillo 2964 Terrell Sullivan 3375 Gregory Buck 2958 Veronica Grey 3372 Gricelda Ruano 2949 Victor Pazos 3363 Henry Completo 2942 William Mimiaga 3350 Ignacio Rodriguez 2933 Willie Gilmore 3339 Irma Laredo 2920 Yesenia Cruz 3175 Joellyn Johnson 3334 Joselito Mella 3323 Judy Lim 3310 Julio Del Cid 2903 Julio Gonzalez 3301 Jun O. Santos 3297 Khalil Subat 3244 Lisa Simonyi 3283 Lois Elisa Jordan 3281 Magdalena Avila 3265 Manija Subat 3259 Manuela Badilla 3227 Marcia Willoughby 3213 Marco Badilla 3210 Maria Barajas 3197 Maria Elena Del Cid 3183 Martin Kassowitz 3178 Mary Serrano 3162 Mesbel Mohamoud 12-12020-mg Doc 6439 Filed 02/06/14 Entered 02/06/14 15:55:16 Main Document Pg 18 of 18
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.