USA v. Howard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) CASE NO. 1:21-cr-00466-3
)
PLAINTIFF, ) CHIEF JUDGE SARA LIOI
)
vs. )
)
)
)
ORDER ON VIOLATION OF
CONDITIONS OF SUPERVISED
RELEASE
TYVIONE GUTHERY, )
)
DEFENDANT. )
A Superseding Violation Report was filed in this case on November 7, 2025, and a
Supplemental Information Report was filed on February 3, 2026. The Court referred this
matter to Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp to conduct appropriate proceedings and to
file a report and recommendation. Magistrate Judge Knapp reported that a supervised
released violation hearing was held on February 3, 2026. The defendant admitted to the
following violations:
1. Failure to Pay Restitution; and
2. New Law Violation.
The magistrate judge filed a report and recommendation on February 3, 2026, in
which the magistrate judge recommended that the Court find that the defendant has violated
the conditions of his supervised release as set forth in violation numbers 1, and 2.
Case: 1:21-cr-00466-SL Doc #: 177 Filed: 02/10/26 1 of 3. PageID #: <pageID>

2
A final supervised release violation hearing was conducted on February 10, 2026.
Present were the following: Assistant U.S. Attorney Toni B. Schnellinger Feisthamel,
representing the United States; Attorney Timothy J. Kucharski, representing the defendant;
the defendant Tyvione Guthery; and United States Probation Officer Camil Croft.
No objections were filed to the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge.
Upon review, the Court adopts the report and recommendation and finds the defendant to
be in violation of the terms and conditions of his supervised release as set forth in violation
numbers 1, and 2.
IT IS ORDERED that the defendant's supervised release is revoked, and the
defendant is committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons for a term of 6 months, with
credit for time served to date. Defendant’s restitution obligation is reimposed. Upon release
from BOP custody, the defendant will be placed on supervised release for a period of 2 years,
with the same terms and conditions as previously imposed, and with the following additional
conditions:
Cognitive Behavioral Treatment: You must participate in a cognitive-behavioral
treatment program and follow the rules and regulations of that program. The probation officer
will supervise your participation in the program (provider, location, modality, duration,
intensity, etc.).
Anger Management Treatment: At the discretion of the probation officer.
Additionally, defendant’s restitution obligation previously imposed as part of his
sentence is reimposed, as follows:
Case: 1:21-cr-00466-SL Doc #: 177 Filed: 02/10/26 2 of 3. PageID #: <pageID>

3
Restitution: The defendant must pay his outstanding restitution obligation to JP
Morgan Chase Bank in the amount of $14,500.00, less any amount paid to date.
Defendant remanded.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 10, 2026
HONORABLE SARA LIOI
CHIEF JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case: 1:21-cr-00466-SL Doc #: 177 Filed: 02/10/26 3 of 3. PageID #: <pageID>