Dahms v. Commissioner of Social Security

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
Megan Dahms, 	Case No. 3:25-cv-2549
Plaintiff,
v. 	ORDER AND
JUDGMENT ENTRY
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
On September 30, 2026, United States Magistrate Judge Reuben J. Sheperd issued a Report
and Recommendation (“R & R”) recommending I affirm the Commissioner of Social Security’s
decision denying Plaintiff’s application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). (Doc. No. 11).
In the R & R, he notified the parties:
Within 14 days after being served with a copy of this report and recommendation, a
party may serve and file specific written objections to the proposed findings and
recommendations of the magistrate judge. Rule 72(b)(2), Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure; see also 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.3(b). . . . Failure to file
objections within the specified time may result in the forfeiture or waiver of the right
to raise the issue on appeal either to the district judge or in a subsequent appeal to
the United States Court of Appeals, depending on how or whether the party
responds to the report and recommendation. Berkshire v. Dahl, 928 F.3d 520, 530
(6th Cir. 2019).
(Id. at 24).
Fourteen days passed, and no party filed any objection to the R & R. I consider their
decision not to file objections to “constitute a waiver of subsequent review,” Local R. 72.3(b), and
adopt Judge Sheperd’s R & R in its entirety as the final Order of this Court. The Commissioner’s
decision is affirmed, and this case is closed.
So Ordered.
s/ Jeffrey J. Helmick
United States District Judge
Case: 3:25-cv-02549-JJH Doc #: 12 Filed: 10/15/26 1 of 1. PageID #: <pageID>