Williams v. Fifth Third Bank

1:26-cv-00590OhsdOct 14, 2026

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
VERONICA WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff,
vs.
FIFTH THIRD BANK,
Defendant.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Case No. 1:26-cv-590
Judge Jeffery P. Hopkins
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 5) issued
by Chief Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on August 5, 2026. The Magistrate Judge
recommends this case be dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution. No objections
have been filed and the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired.
Having carefully reviewed the comprehensive findings and conclusions of the
Magistrate Judge and finding no clear error, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and
Recommendation in its entirety. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 (advisory committee notes from 1983
amendment) (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there
is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation”); see e.g.,
Roane v. Warden of Corr. Reception Ctr., No. 2:22-cv-2768, 2022 WL 16535903, at *1 (S.D. Ohio
Oct. 28, 2022). Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES this case for lack of prosecution.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
October 14, 2026
Jeffery P. Hopkins
United States District Judge
Case: 1:26-cv-00590-JPH-SKB Doc #: 6 Filed: 10/14/26 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.