1:26-cv-00590•Williams v. Fifth Third Bank
Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION VERONICA WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, vs. FIFTH THIRD BANK, Defendant. : : : : : : : : : Case No. 1:26-cv-590 Judge Jeffery P. Hopkins ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 5) issued by Chief Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on August 5, 2026. The Magistrate Judge recommends this case be dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution. No objections have been filed and the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired. Having carefully reviewed the comprehensive findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge and finding no clear error, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 (advisory committee notes from 1983 amendment) (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation”); see e.g., Roane v. Warden of Corr. Reception Ctr., No. 2:22-cv-2768, 2022 WL 16535903, at *1 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 28, 2022). Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES this case for lack of prosecution. IT IS SO ORDERED. October 14, 2026 Jeffery P. Hopkins United States District Judge Case: 1:26-cv-00590-JPH-SKB Doc #: 6 Filed: 10/14/26 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.