2:25-cv-00757•Rudolph v. Harrison Metropolitan Housing Authority et al
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ISIS RUDOLPH, SR, Plaintiff, v. HARRISON METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY, et al., Defendants. Civil Action 2:25-cv-757 Judge Algenon L. Marbley Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Notice to the Court Regarding Discovery Communications and Request for Coordination of Remaining Discovery (ECF No. 67). Therein, Plaintiff requests that “any remaining discovery requests from Defendants be coordinated and served in a consolidated manner whenever possible. Specifically, Plaintiff requests that counsel for Defendants coordinate the timing of any remaining discovery requests so that Requests for Production, interrogatories, or other discovery materials are served simultaneously rather than in a staggered manner.” (Id.) Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 67) is DENIED. There are only two Defendants in this case such that keeping track of which party served discovery should not be overly onerous for Plaintiff, even taking into account her disabilities. Moreover, Defendants’ discovery needs may not line up in the manner Plaintiff is suggesting. If Plaintiff requires additional time to respond to Case: 2:25-cv-00757-ALM-CMV Doc #: 68 Filed: 03/12/26 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
2 Defendants’ discovery requests, she may move for extensions of time after soliciting Defendants’ consent as provided for in S.D. Ohio Civ. R. 7.3(a). IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Chelsey M. Vascura CHELSEY M. VASCURA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case: 2:25-cv-00757-ALM-CMV Doc #: 68 Filed: 03/12/26 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.