USA v. Brown et al

3:25-cr-00019OhsdMar 2, 2026

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff, 	Case No. 3:25-cr-19-2
vs.
CHRISTOPHER BROWN, 	District Judge Michael J. Newman
Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry
Defendant.
ORDER: (1) ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. No. 102); (2) GRANTING THE PARTIES’ JOINT
MOTION FOR A CHANGE OF PLEA (Doc. No. 92); (3) ACCEPTING DEFENDANT’S
PLEA OF GUILTY AS CHARGED IN COUNT 4 OF THE INDICTMENT; AND (4)
DEFERRING THE DECISION OF WHETHER TO ACCEPT THE PLEA AGREEMENT
UNTIL THE SENTENCING HEARING
This criminal case is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the United States
Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 102), recommending that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea. There
being no objections to the well-reasoned Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), the Court ADOPTS
the R&R in full. The parties’ joint motion to change plea (Doc. No. 92) is GRANTED, and the Court
ACCEPTS Defendant’s plea of guilty as charged in Count 4 of the Indictment, which charges him
with knowingly and intentionally distributing 50 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing
a detectable amount of methamphetamine, its salts, isomers, and salts of its isomers, in violation of
Title 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(l) and (b)(l)(B)(viii). The Court DEFERS the decision of whether to accept
the plea agreement until the sentencing hearing.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
March 2, 2026 	s/Michael J. Newman
Hon. Michael J. Newman
United States District Judge
Case: 3:25-cr-00019-MJN Doc #: 105 Filed: 03/02/26 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.