3:25-cr-00019•USA v. Brown et al
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Case No. 3:25-cr-19-2 vs. CHRISTOPHER BROWN, District Judge Michael J. Newman Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry Defendant. ORDER: (1) ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. No. 102); (2) GRANTING THE PARTIES’ JOINT MOTION FOR A CHANGE OF PLEA (Doc. No. 92); (3) ACCEPTING DEFENDANT’S PLEA OF GUILTY AS CHARGED IN COUNT 4 OF THE INDICTMENT; AND (4) DEFERRING THE DECISION OF WHETHER TO ACCEPT THE PLEA AGREEMENT UNTIL THE SENTENCING HEARING This criminal case is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 102), recommending that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea. There being no objections to the well-reasoned Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), the Court ADOPTS the R&R in full. The parties’ joint motion to change plea (Doc. No. 92) is GRANTED, and the Court ACCEPTS Defendant’s plea of guilty as charged in Count 4 of the Indictment, which charges him with knowingly and intentionally distributing 50 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine, its salts, isomers, and salts of its isomers, in violation of Title 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(l) and (b)(l)(B)(viii). The Court DEFERS the decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the sentencing hearing. IT IS SO ORDERED. March 2, 2026 s/Michael J. Newman Hon. Michael J. Newman United States District Judge Case: 3:25-cr-00019-MJN Doc #: 105 Filed: 03/02/26 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.