6:24-cv-00040•Rural Water District No. 6 Wagoner County, Oklahoma v. City of Wagoner, Oklahoma et al
Rural Water District No. 6 Wagoner County, Oklahoma v. City of Wagoner, Oklahoma et al
6:24-cv-00040OkedJan 13, 2026
Full text
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA RURAL WATER DISTRICT NO. 6, ) WAGONER COUNTY, OKLAHOMA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 24-cv-40-DES ) CITY OF WAGONER, AND WAGONER ) PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY, ) ) Defendants. ) OPINION AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. (Docket No. 55). Having reviewed the written briefs and hearing oral argument on the same, Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Based on the ruling in Pittsburg County Rural Water District. No. 7 v. City of McAlester, 346 F.3d 1260, 1276-77 (10th Cir. 2003), as a matter of law, estoppel cannot be invoked to subvert the application of a statute enacted in the public interest. Since Courts have found that the purposes of 7 U.S.C. § 1926(b) are to encourage rural water development and to safeguard the interest of the Untied Sates in having loans repaid, both purposes of which are aimed at promoting the public interest. Accordingly, Defendants’ affirmative defenses of estoppel and laches cannot be used to defeat the District’s claims and they will be stricken and dismissed. IT IS SO ORDERED this 13 th day of January, 2026 ____________________________________ D. Edward Snow United States Magistrate Judge 6:24-cv-00040-DES Document 97 Filed in ED/OK on 01/13/26 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.