Curtis et al v. Firstar Financial Corporation et al

6:24-cv-00243OkedJul 14, 2026

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
JACKIE GAIL CURTIS, et al.,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 24-CV-243-JFH-GLJ
SUSAN CHAPMAN,
Defendant.
ORDER
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation [Dkt. No. 111] of United States
Magistrate Judge Gerald L. Jackson recommending that Defendant Susan Chapman’s Motion for
Summary Judgment [Dkt. No. 96] be granted in part and denied in part; that Plaintiffs’ Motion to
File their Response to Susan Chapman’s Motion for Summary Judgment Out of Time [Dkt. No.
101] be granted; and that Defendant Chapman’s request for sanctions be denied. No party objected
to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation within the 14-day period prescribed by 28
U.S.C. § 636(b). Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the Court concurs with the
Magistrate Judge’s recommendation and accepts and adopts it as the order of the Court.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion to File their Response to Susan
Chapman’s Motion for Summary Judgment Out of Time [Dkt. No. 101] is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. No.
96] be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Specifically, Plaintiffs’ federal claims
against Defendant Chapman shall be DISMISSED. Plaintiffs’ remaining state law claims for
breach of contract, fraud, and intentional infliction of emotional distress shall be REMANDED to
the District Court of Muskogee County, Oklahoma.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s request for sanctions is DENIED.
6:24-cv-00243-JFH-GLJ Document 112 Filed in ED/OK on 07/14/26 Page 1 of 2
2
IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of July 2026.
____________________________________
JOHN F. HEIL, III
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6:24-cv-00243-JFH-GLJ Document 112 Filed in ED/OK on 07/14/26 Page 2 of 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.