5:22-cv-00522•Terry et al v. City of Oklahoma City Oklahoma et al
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA SINCERE TERRY et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-22-522-G ) CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY, ) OKLAHOMA, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER Now before the Court are a Motion to Strike (Doc. No. 29) and two Motions to Dismiss (Doc. Nos. 32, 35), filed regarding Plaintiffs’ original Complaint (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiffs have now timely filed an Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 39). Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint supersedes the original Complaint and renders it of no legal effect. See Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, the pending Motions (Doc. Nos. 29, 32, 35) are DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of September, 2023. Case 5:22-cv-00522-G Document 54 Filed 09/26/23 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.