Romero v. United States of America et al

5:24-cv-01233OkwdFeb 5, 2025

Full text

1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
ANTHONY J. ROMERO, 	)
)
Plaintiff, 	)
)
v. 	) 	No. CIV-24-1233-R
)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., 	)
)
Defendants. 	)
ORDER
On December 30, 2024, United States Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell issued a
Report and Recommendation recommending that the Court dismiss Plaintiff Anthony J.
Romero’s claim against Defendant FCI-El Reno with prejudice as an improperly named
party, as well as his emergency call-button claim without prejudice to re-filing for lack of
subject matter jurisdiction [Doc. No. 9 at p. 8].
Judge Mitchell informed Plaintiff of his right to file objections to the Report and
Recommendation, instructed him that such objections were due by January 21, 2025, and
advised that a failure to object “waives the right to appellate review of both factual and
legal questions contained herein.” Id.
To date, neither an objection nor a request for extension of time to object to the
Report and Recommendation has been filed. With no objections being filed within the time
prescribed, on de novo review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation in its
entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s claim against FCI-El Reno is DISMISSED with prejudice,
and Plaintiff’s emergency call-button claim is DISMISSED without prejudice.
Case 5:24-cv-01233-R Document 11 Filed 02/05/25 Page 1 of 2
2
IT IS SO ORDERED this 5 th day of February, 2025.
Case 5:24-cv-01233-R Document 11 Filed 02/05/25 Page 2 of 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.