Singh v. Warden Facility Administrator of Cimarron Correctional Facility et al

5:26-cv-00311OkwdApr 14, 2026

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
CHAIT SINGH,
Petitioner,
v.
TODD BLANCHE, et al.,
Respondents.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CIV-26-311-D
ORDER
This matter is before the Court for review of the Report and Recommendation issued
by 	United 	States 	Magistrate 	Judge 	Amanda 	L. 	Maxfield 	pursuant 	to 	28 	U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1)(B) and (C). [Doc. No. 14]. Judge Maxfield recommends that Petitioner’s
Petition for Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [Doc. No. 1] be denied because
he received a bond hearing pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226, and the Court lacks jurisdiction to
review the immigration judge’s determination denying Petitioner bond.
The case file shows no timely objection to the Report and Recommendation nor
request for an extension of time, even though Petitioner was expressly informed of his right
to object, the procedure for doing so, and the consequences of failing to object. Therefore,
the Court finds that Petitioner has waived further review of all issues addressed in the
Report. See Moore v. United States, 950 F.2d 656, 659 (10th Cir. 1991); see also United
States v. 2121 East 30th Street, 73 F.3d 1057, 1060 (10th Cir. 1996). 	For the reasons
explained by Judge Maxfield, the Court finds that the Petition [Doc. No. 1] is DENIED.
Case 5:26-cv-00311-D Document 15 Filed 04/14/26 Page 1 of 2
2
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [Doc.
No. 14] is ADOPTED in its entirety. Petitioner’s Petition [Doc. No. 1] is DENIED. A
separate judgment shall be entered.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 14 th day of April, 2026.
TIMOTHY D. DeGIUSTI
Chief United States District Judge
Case 5:26-cv-00311-D Document 15 Filed 04/14/26 Page 2 of 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.