5:26-cv-00356•Hale v. Grady Co Sheriff
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA STEPHEN CHARLES HALE, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-26-356-J ) GRADY COUNTY SHERIFF, ) ) Respondent. ) ORDER Petitioner, a state pre-trial detainee, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. [Doc. No. 1]. The matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Amanda L. Maxfield for initial proceedings consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 636. [Doc. No. 4]. On March 11, 2026, Judge Maxfield issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed without prejudice. [Doc. No. 6]. Petitioner was advised of his right to object to the Report and Recommendation by April 1, 2026. On March 24, 2026, Petitioner filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, which triggers de novo review. [Doc. No. 7]. Having carefully reviewed the § 2241 petition, the Report and Recommendation, and Petitioner’s objections de novo, the Court agrees with Judge Maxfield’s conclusions that this Court should abstain from addressing claims relating to Petitioner’s ongoing state criminal proceedings and that the Petition should be dismissed without prejudice. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 6] and DISMISSES Petitioner’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED this 26 th day of March, 2026. Case 5:26-cv-00356-J Document 8 Filed 03/26/26 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.