Singh v. Mullin et al

1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
NAVDEEP SINGH,
Petitioner,
v.
MARKWAYNE MULLIN, et al.,
Respondents.
)
)
)
)
)
) 	Case No. CIV-26-1733-PRW
)
)
)
)
ORDER
Before the Court is Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Dkt. 1). This
case is one of many habeas petitions filed by an alien detainee challenging the legal basis
for his detention. On September 30, 2026, Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin issued a Report
and Recommendation (Dkt. 11) recommending that the Court deny Petitioner’s Petition.
The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 11) advised the parties of their right to
object on or before October 7, 2026.1 No party filed an objection to the Report and
Recommendation. In the absence of a timely objection, the Court reviews the Report and
Recommendation to confirm that there is no plain error on the face of the record. 2 Finding
none, the Court agrees with Judge Erwin’s analysis and conclusions.
1 R. & R. (Dkt. 11), at 9.
2 Summers v. State of Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167–68 (10th Cir. 1991) (“In the absence of
timely objection, the district court may review a magistrate’s report under any standard it
deems appropriate.”).
Case 5:26-cv-01733-PRW Document 12 Filed 10/14/26 Page 1 of 2

2
For the foregoing reasons, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation
(Dkt. 11) and DENIES the Petition (Dkt. 1).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of October 2026.
Case 5:26-cv-01733-PRW Document 12 Filed 10/14/26 Page 2 of 2