Lorenzo Gilberto Grant and Triss Marie Grant

4:05-bk-26658PaebMar 28, 2006

Full text

1. The proper venue for a case commenced under the Bankruptcy Code is the district in which the domicile,
residence, principal place of business in the United States, or principal assets in the United States, of the
person or entity that is the subject of the case have been located for the 180 days immediately preceding the
commencement of the case. 28 U.S.C. §1408(1).
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
In re:
LORENZO GILBERTO GRANT 	: 	Case No. 05-26658REF
a/k/a LORENZO G. GRANT
TRISS MARIE GRANT 	:
a/k/a TRISS M. GRANT,
Debtor(s) 	:
:
ORDER
AND NOW, this 	28 th day of March, 2006, upon consideration of the show cause
hearing held on March 23, 2006, during which Debtors were directed to show cause why this case
should not be dismissed or venue transferred as against Debtor, Lorenzo G. Grant (“Mr. Grant”),
because Mr. Grant does not reside in this District, it is ORDERED that the Rule to Show Cause
issued on February 28, 2006 is hereby DISCHARGED because we find that venue may remain in
this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1408 and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 1014(a)(2). The interests of justice
and the convenience of the parties are served because Debtors have shown that the majority of the
marital property is in this District, see Debtor’s Response to Show Cause Order, ¶17,1 and no party
in interest has objected to venue in Mr. Grant’s case remaining in this District. 	See Collier on
Bankruptcy, 15 th Ed. Rev. ¶1014.03[1] at 1014-7 in which the treatise notes that a court may retain
an improperly filed case if no party in interest objects. (“In that case, the 1987 Advisory Committee
Case 05-26658-ref Doc 19 Filed 03/28/06 Entered 03/28/06 13:31:07 Desc Main
Document Page 1 of 2
2
Note state that ‘[i]f a timely motion to dismiss for improper venue is not filed, the right to object to
venue is waived.’”); ICMR, Inc. v. Tri-City Foods, Inc., 100 B.R. 51, 54 (D. Kan. 1989); Bryan v.
Land (In re Land), 215 B.R. 398, 403 (B.A.P.8th Cir. 1997). Finally, we do not believe that any
creditors will be prejudiced if venue in Mr. Grant’s case remains in this District.
BY THE COURT
RICHARD E. FEHLING
United States Bankruptcy Judge
Case 05-26658-ref Doc 19 Filed 03/28/06 Entered 03/28/06 13:31:07 Desc Main
Document Page 2 of 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.