4:05-bk-26658•Lorenzo Gilberto Grant and Triss Marie Grant
Full text
1. The proper venue for a case commenced under the Bankruptcy Code is the district in which the domicile, residence, principal place of business in the United States, or principal assets in the United States, of the person or entity that is the subject of the case have been located for the 180 days immediately preceding the commencement of the case. 28 U.S.C. §1408(1). UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA In re: LORENZO GILBERTO GRANT : Case No. 05-26658REF a/k/a LORENZO G. GRANT TRISS MARIE GRANT : a/k/a TRISS M. GRANT, Debtor(s) : : ORDER AND NOW, this 28 th day of March, 2006, upon consideration of the show cause hearing held on March 23, 2006, during which Debtors were directed to show cause why this case should not be dismissed or venue transferred as against Debtor, Lorenzo G. Grant (“Mr. Grant”), because Mr. Grant does not reside in this District, it is ORDERED that the Rule to Show Cause issued on February 28, 2006 is hereby DISCHARGED because we find that venue may remain in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1408 and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 1014(a)(2). The interests of justice and the convenience of the parties are served because Debtors have shown that the majority of the marital property is in this District, see Debtor’s Response to Show Cause Order, ¶17,1 and no party in interest has objected to venue in Mr. Grant’s case remaining in this District. See Collier on Bankruptcy, 15 th Ed. Rev. ¶1014.03[1] at 1014-7 in which the treatise notes that a court may retain an improperly filed case if no party in interest objects. (“In that case, the 1987 Advisory Committee Case 05-26658-ref Doc 19 Filed 03/28/06 Entered 03/28/06 13:31:07 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 2
2 Note state that ‘[i]f a timely motion to dismiss for improper venue is not filed, the right to object to venue is waived.’”); ICMR, Inc. v. Tri-City Foods, Inc., 100 B.R. 51, 54 (D. Kan. 1989); Bryan v. Land (In re Land), 215 B.R. 398, 403 (B.A.P.8th Cir. 1997). Finally, we do not believe that any creditors will be prejudiced if venue in Mr. Grant’s case remains in this District. BY THE COURT RICHARD E. FEHLING United States Bankruptcy Judge Case 05-26658-ref Doc 19 Filed 03/28/06 Entered 03/28/06 13:31:07 Desc Main Document Page 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.