1:17-cr-10005•USA v. Spotted Horse
Full text
FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MAR 3 0 2:12 DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA NORTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, I:I7-CR-10005-CBK Plaintiff, ORDER vs. CHAVEZ SPOTTED HORSE, Defendant. Defendant was convicted ofthree counts of child abuse and three counts of assault with a dangerous weapon. He was sentenced on January 4,2018, to a total sentence of76 months custody, with the sentence to run consecutive to the sentence of 78 months imposed in 1:17-CR-100I3-CBK for the crime of receipt of images depicting the sexual exploitation of minors. Defendant appealed his conviction and sentence and the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed. United States v. Spotted Horse. 916 F.3d 686(8th Cir. 2019). Defendant has filed a motion for review of sentence and for the appointment of counsel. Defendant contends that he is entitled to relief because the United States Supreme Court, in Borden v. United States. U.S. , 141 S. Ct. 1817, 210 L. Ed. 2d 63 (2021), held that a prior criminal offense does not qualify as a violent felony under the Armed Career Criminal Act(ACCA), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), if the prior offense requires only a mens rea ofrecklessness. ACCA mandates a minimum sentence of 15 years ifthe defendant is being sentenced for certain firearms offenses after having committed three or more prior violent felonies. Defendant was not sentenced under ACCA. He was sentenced in this case for the crimes of child abuse and assault with a dangerous weapon. His sentencing guideline range was not enhanced under the career offender guideline, 18 U.S.S.G. § 4BI.I, which Case 1:17-cr-10005-CBK Document 137 Filed 03/30/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
also requires a finding that defendant committed prior crimes of violence. Borden is not applicable to defendant's offenses of conviction, nor his sentences. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that defendant's motions, Doc. 136, for review of sentence and for the appointment of counsel are denied. DATED this of March, 2022. BY THE COURT: CHARLES B. KORNMANN United States District Judge Case 1:17-cr-10005-CBK Document 137 Filed 03/30/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.