USA v. Santiago et al

1:25-cr-00069TnedDec 11, 2025

Full text

1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
AT CHATTANOOGA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
COREY DEMOND PETERS
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 1:25-cr-00069
District Judge Travis R. McDonough
Magistrate Judge Christopher H. Steger
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge conducted
a plea hearing in this case on December 10, 2025. At the hearing, Defendant entered a plea of
guilty to Count Twenty-Four of the thirty-four count Indictment. On the basis of the record made
at the hearing, the Court finds that Defendant is fully competent and capable of entering an
informed plea; the plea is made knowingly and with full understanding of each of the rights waived
by Defendant; it is made voluntarily and free from any force, threats, or promises; Defendant
understands the nature of the charges and penalties provided by law; and the plea has a sufficient
basis in fact. Acceptance of the plea, adjudication of guilt, acceptance of the Plea Agreement, and
imposition of sentence are specifically reserved for the District Judge.
I therefore recommend that the Court: (1) grant Defendant’s motion to withdraw his not
guilty plea to Count Twenty-Four of the thirty-four count Indictment; (2) accept Defendant’s guilty
plea to Count Twenty-Four of the thirty-four count Indictment; (3) adjudicate Defendant guilty of
distribution of fifty grams or more of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and
841(b)(1)(A); and (4) order that Defendant remain in custody pending sentencing or further order
of this Court.
The Defendant’s sentencing hearing is scheduled before the Honorable Chief United States
District Judge Travis R. McDonough on April 24, 2026, at 9:00 a.m.
Case 1:25-cr-00069-TRM-CHS Document 162 Filed 12/11/25 Page 1 of 2 PageID
#: <pageID>
2
ENTER.
/s/ Christopher H. Steger
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
NOTICE TO PARTIES
You have the right to de novo review by the district judge of the foregoing findings. Any
application for review must be in writing; must specify the portions of the findings or proceedings
objected to; and must be filed and served no later than fourteen (14) days after the plea hearing.
Failure to file objections within fourteen days constitutes a waiver of any further right to challenge
the plea of guilty in this matter. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).
Case 1:25-cr-00069-TRM-CHS Document 162 Filed 12/11/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID
#: <pageID>

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.