3:22-cv-00605•City of Murfreesboro, Tennessee v. BFI Waste Systems of Tennessee, LLC et al
City of Murfreesboro, Tennessee v. BFI Waste Systems of Tennessee, LLC et al
3:22-cv-00605TnmdApr 22, 2026
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION CITY OF MURFREESBORO, TENNESSEE, Plaintiff, v. BFI WASTE SYSTEMS OF TENNESSEE, LLC et al., Defendants. Case No. 3:22-cv-00605 Judge Eli J. Richardson Magistrate Judge Luke A. Evans MEMORANDUM ORDER On April 22, 2026, the Court held a telephonic discovery dispute conference to address the parties’ joint discovery dispute statement. (Doc. No. 272.) The issue raised in the joint discovery dispute statement—whether plaintiff may serve proposed1 document subpoenas on third-party consultants under the terms of the special master’s report (Doc. Nos. 219, 244)—was not resolved, and motion practice will be necessary. The Court sets a schedule for motion practice as follows: 1) On or before May 15, 2026, defendants will file a motion for a protective order under Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. As discussed at the discovery dispute conference, Rule 45 normally governs the service of subpoenas and any objections to them. The terms of the special master’s report, however, creates the need to take the preliminary step of assessing previously established limits on discovery. 2) Plaintiff will file any response on or before May 22, 2026. 3) Defendants will file any reply on or before May 29, 2026. 1 To the Court’s best understanding, the subpoenas attached to the joint discovery dispute statement (Doc. Nos. 272-2, 272-3, 272-4) are drafts only and were not served. The parties should confirm the Court’s understanding in their motion papers; if instead the subpoenas had been served then the parties should state whether objections had been served under Rule 45(d)(2)(B). Case 3:22-cv-00605 Document 284 Filed 04/22/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
2 4) The Court will decide later whether oral argument on the motion will be necessary. It is so ORDERED. ____________________________________ LUKE A. EVANS United States Magistrate Judge Case 3:22-cv-00605 Document 284 Filed 04/22/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.