3:25-cv-00495•Burgess v. DOJI, INC. et al
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION MONSIEUR SHAWNELLIAS BURGESS, Plaintiff, v. DOJI, INC. et al., Defendants. Case No. 3:25-cv-00495 Judge Aleta A. Trauger Magistrate Judge Luke A. Evans MEMORANDUM ORDER On April 16, 2026, plaintiff filed a motion for a protective order. (Doc. No. 153.) The motion is DENIED. The discovery issues that will be addressed in the upcoming scheduling and discovery conference do not affect the deposition of plaintiff. The parties will conduct plaintiff’s deposition on or before May 15, 2026. The Court will not entertain any request for costs and fees at this time (Doc. No. 157), but defendants may renew their request after plaintiff’s deposition concludes. It is so ORDERED. ____________________________________ LUKE A. EVANS United States Magistrate Judge Case 3:25-cv-00495 Document 168 Filed 04/29/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.