Burgess v. DOJI, INC. et al

3:25-cv-00495TnmdApr 29, 2026

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
MONSIEUR SHAWNELLIAS BURGESS,
Plaintiff,
v.
DOJI, INC. et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 3:25-cv-00495
Judge Aleta A. Trauger
Magistrate Judge Luke A. Evans
MEMORANDUM ORDER
On April 16, 2026, plaintiff filed a motion for a protective order. (Doc. No. 153.) The
motion is DENIED. The discovery issues that will be addressed in the upcoming scheduling and
discovery conference do not affect the deposition of plaintiff.
The parties will conduct plaintiff’s deposition on or before May 15, 2026. The Court will
not entertain any request for costs and fees at this time (Doc. No. 157), but defendants may renew
their request after plaintiff’s deposition concludes.
It is so ORDERED.
____________________________________
LUKE A. EVANS
United States Magistrate Judge
Case 3:25-cv-00495 Document 168 Filed 04/29/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.