Moore et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MIDLAND/ODESSA DIVISION
CHRISTINE M. MOORE and
MICHAEL MOORE,
Plaintiffs,
v.
FEDERAL NATIONAL
MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION et al.,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
MO:25-CV-00326-DC
ORDER
Before the Court is the report and recommendation from United States Magistrate
Judge Ronald C. Griffin (Doc. 27) concerning Plaintiffs Christine and Michael Moore’s
Motions to Remand to State Court (Docs. 8, 16). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Rule
1(d) of Appendix C of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Western
District of Texas, Magistrate Judge Griffin issued his report and recommendation on
December 1, 2025. As of the date of this Order, neither party has filed objections.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), a party may serve and file specific, written objections
to a magistrate judge’s proposed findings and recommendations within fourteen days after
being served with a copy and, in doing so, secure de novo review by the district court. When
no objections are timely filed, a district court reviews the magistrate’s report and
recommendation for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory committee’s note (“When no
timely objection is filed, the [district] court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error
on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.”). Because no party has
filed timely objections, the Court reviews the Report and Recommendation for clear error,
finding none.
Case 7:25-cv-00326-DC-RCG Document 29 Filed 01/03/26 Page 1 of 2

2
In summary, Plaintiffs’ motions to remand are DENIED.
It is so ORDERED.
SIGNED this 3rd day of January, 2026.
DAVID COUNTS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 7:25-cv-00326-DC-RCG Document 29 Filed 01/03/26 Page 2 of 2