Ward v. . Ward

CourtListener 3901711NcsuperctJul 5, 1802

Full text

The cases cited to prove this a delivery do not come up to what is wished. This is not a delivery in law, and I believe, from the circumstances, was not so intended by the father. He knew a deed without delivery was not effectual; but his children, who were dissatisfied at the prospect of his marrying again, did not know it, and the old man adopted this mode of procuring his peace.

Decree according to the prayer of the bill.

NOTE. — See Kirk v. Turner, 16 N.C. 14; Vanhook v. Barnett,15 N.C. 268; Tate v. Tate, 21 N.C. 22; Moore v. Collins, 15 N.C. 384;Gibson v. Partee, 19 N.C. 530; Clayton v. Liverman, 20 N.C. 238;Waddell v. Hewitt, 36 N.C. 475.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.