CourtListener 10309505•Katherine Spaulding v. Harold Ekstrom
Full text
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
SUPREME COURT
In Case No. 2021-0557, Katherine Spaulding v. Harold
Ekstrom, the court on October 17, 2022, issued the following
order:
Having considered the briefs filed by the plaintiff, Katherine Spaulding, the
memorandum of law filed by the defendant, Harold Ekstrom, and the record
submitted on appeal, the court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary in
this case, see Sup. Ct. R. 18(1), and that the plaintiff, as the appealing party, has
not established reversible error, see Sup. Ct. R. 25(8); Gallo v. Traina, 166 N.H.
737, 740 (2014).
Affirmed.
MacDonald, C.J., and Hicks, Bassett, Hantz Marconi, and Donovan, JJ.,
concurred.
Timothy A. Gudas,
Clerk
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.