Katherine Spaulding v. Harold Ekstrom

CourtListener 10309505NhOct 17, 2022

Full text

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

SUPREME COURT

In Case No. 2021-0557, Katherine Spaulding v. Harold
Ekstrom, the court on October 17, 2022, issued the following
order:

Having considered the briefs filed by the plaintiff, Katherine Spaulding, the
memorandum of law filed by the defendant, Harold Ekstrom, and the record
submitted on appeal, the court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary in
this case, see Sup. Ct. R. 18(1), and that the plaintiff, as the appealing party, has
not established reversible error, see Sup. Ct. R. 25(8); Gallo v. Traina, 166 N.H.
737, 740 (2014).

Affirmed.

MacDonald, C.J., and Hicks, Bassett, Hantz Marconi, and Donovan, JJ.,
concurred.

Timothy A. Gudas,
Clerk

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.