State of New Hampshire v. Jon Cline

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

SUPREME COURT

In Case No. 2021-0575, State of New Hampshire v. Jon
Cline, the court on August 11, 2022, issued the following order:

Having considered the defendant’s brief, the State’s memorandum of law,
and the record submitted on appeal, we conclude that oral argument is
unnecessary in this case. See Sup. Ct. R. 18(1). The defendant, Jon Cline,
appeals his conviction, following a bench trial in the Circuit Court (Boyle, J.),
on a charge of harassment. See RSA 644:4 (Supp. 2021). He argues that the
evidence was insufficient, as a matter of law, to support his conviction. The
State agrees. Accordingly, we reverse the defendant’s conviction.

Reversed.

MacDonald, C.J., and Hicks, Bassett, Hantz Marconi, and Donovan, JJ.,
concurred.

Timothy A. Gudas,
Clerk