82-02•EDITH MELIE V. STATE-OPERATED SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, ESSEX COUNTY, 3/11/02 (#82-02)
EDITH MELIE V. STATE-OPERATED SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, ESSEX COUNTY, 3/11/02 (#82-02)
82-02Njcommned
Full text
82-02 EDITH MELIE, : PETITIONER, : V. : COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION STATE-OPERATED SCHOOL DISTRICT : OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, ESSEX DECISION COUNTY, : RESPONDENT. : _____________________________________________ : SYNOPSIS Petitioning teacher challenged the withholding of her increment for the 1999-2000 school year. After hearing testimony and receiving evidence, the ALJ determined that the District properly withheld petitionerís increment based, inter alia, on her failure to use effective instructional methods, establish and maintain discipline and failure to appraise the effectiveness of her own instructional program and methods. The Commissioner affirmed the decision of the ALJ and dismissed the petition. This synopsis is not part of the Commissionerís decision. It has been prepared for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Commissioner. March 11, 2002
22 OAL DKT. NO. EDU 10217-00 AGENCY DKT. NO. 410-11/00 EDITH MELIE, : PETITIONER, : V. : COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION STATE-OPERATED SCHOOL DISTRICT : OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, ESSEX DECISION COUNTY, : RESPONDENT. : _____________________________________________ : The record of this matter and the Initial Decision of the Office of Administrative Law (OAL) have been reviewed. The parties did not file exceptions. Upon careful and independent review of the record, which includes transcripts of the hearings conducted at the OAL on October 22 and October 23, 2001, the Commissioner determines to affirm the Initial Decision. As noted, it is petitionerís burden to prove, by a preponderance of the credible evidence, that the Districtís decision to withhold her increment was arbitrary, capricious or unreasonable, based on the facts. See Kopera, supra. Finding no cause to disturb the findings, credibility determinations and conclusions of the ALJ, the Commissioner concurs that petitioner has failed to meet her burden. Accordingly, the within Petition of Appeal is dismissed. IT IS SO ORDERED. * COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION Date of Decision: 3/11/02 Date of Mailing: 3/11/02 * This decision, as the Commissionerís final determination, may be appealed to the State Board of Education pursuant to N.J.S.A. 18A:6-27 et seq. and N.J.A.C. 6A:4-1.1 et seq., within 30 days of its filing. Commissioner decisions are deemed filed three days after the date of mailing to the parties.
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.