GREGORY R. CEA V. NEW JERSEY STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS, OFFICE OF LICENSURE AND CREDENTIALS, 1/30/12, (#38-12)

38-12Njcommned

Full text

#38-12 (OAL Decision: Not yet available online)
GREGORY R. CEA, 	:
PETITIONER, 	:
V. 	: 	COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION
NEW JERSEY STATE 	: 	DECISION
BOARD OF EXAMINERS,
:
RESPONDENT.
:
SYNOPSIS
Pro-se petitioner appealed the respondent’s denial of his request for the issuance of a Teacher of
Career and Technical Education: Carpentry Certificate of Eligibility for failure to attain a passing
score on the required Praxis I exam. Petitioner contends that an allowance of five percent would give
him a passing score on the Praxis, and that he should be allowed to substitute work experience for a
passing score on the Praxis pursuant to N.J.A.C. 6A:9-17.13. 	The respondent filed a motion to
dismiss the appeal in lieu of filing an answer to the petition.
The ALJ found, inter alia, that: 	pursuant to N.J.A.C. 6A:9-5.16(a), the respondent issues the
appropriate certificate upon the candidate’s completion of all certification requirements; the
requirements for career and technical education certification are set forth in N.J.A.C. 6A:9-11.2; for
an experience-based endorsement, a candidate must pass a State-adopted test of basic reading,
writing and mathematical skills; and, pursuant to N.J.A.C. 6A:9-17.16(a), the respondent may not
permit an applicant to substitute education and/or experience for a passing score on any State-
required test. 	The ALJ concluded that petitioner does not meet the requirements for issuance of a
Teacher of Career and Technical Education: Carpentry Certificate of Eligibility and accordingly
ordered the petition dismissed.
Upon review, the Deputy Commissioner – to whom this matter has been delegated pursuant to
N.J.S.A. 18A:4-33 – adopted the Initial Decision of the OAL as the final decision in this matter and
dismissed the petition. In so doing, the Deputy Commissioner noted that denial of certification to
petitioner is compelled by law as petitioner has not satisfied the basic eligibility requirements for the
certificate he seeks.
This synopsis is not part of the Commissioner’s decision. It has been prepared for the convenience of the reader. It
has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Commissioner.
January 30, 2012
1
OAL DKT. NO. EDU 8382-11
AGENCY DKT. NO. 180-7/11
GREGORY R. CEA, 	:
PETITIONER, 	:
V. 	: 	COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION
NEW JERSEY STATE 	: 	DECISION
BOARD OF EXAMINERS,
:
RESPONDENT.
:
The 	record 	of 	this 	matter 	and 	the 	Initial 	Decision 	of 	the
Office of Administrative Law (OAL) have been reviewed. 	Petitioner’s exceptions were timely
filed however, there is no indication that petitioner sent a copy of his exception letter to either
counsel for the State Board of Examiners or the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) as required by
N.J.A.C. 1:1-18.4(a).
Although not contesting that he failed to meet the certification requirements of
Teacher of Career and Technical Education: 	Carpentry Certificate of Eligibility, petitioner’s
exceptions urge that the current rules governing the obtaining of this certificate be amended.
Petitioner contends that Praxis I does not test for the detailed knowledge required to teach
carpentry, and that his four-year carpentry certificate from the New Jersey Department of Labor
– issued after successful completion of 8000 hours of carpentry and construction technology –
along with his 37 years of carpentry and construction experience, should be accepted as
sufficient to qualify him as a teacher of Career and Technical Education.
Upon full review and consideration, the Deputy Commissioner – to whom this
matter has been delegated pursuant to N.J.S.A. 18A:4-33 – concurs with the ALJ that summary
2
decision with respect to the denial of certification to petitioner is appropriately granted to the
State Board of Examiners as such denial is compelled by law.
In so concluding, the Deputy Commissioner is cognizant of the following
regulatory provisions – enacted by the State Board of Education – attendant to this matter:
1) N.J.A.C. 6A:9-11.2(c)(1)(i), which sets forth the eligibility requirements for the experience-
based certificate petitioner is seeking, clearly states that “[a]ll candidates for an experienced-
based endorsement shall pass a state-adopted test of basic reading, writing, and mathematics
skills…” (Praxis exam); 2) pursuant to N.J.A.C. 6A:9-17.16(b), the Board of Examiners is
precluded 	– 	under 	any circumstance – 	from 	waiving 	this 	certification 	requirement; 	and
3) N.J.A.C. 6A:9-17.16(a) clearly and unambiguously precludes the State Board of Examiners
from allowing an applicant to substitute experience for a failing score on the state Praxis exam.
It is uncontested in this matter that petitioner did not achieve a passing score on the Praxis exam.
Consequently, as petitioner has not satisfied the basic eligibility requirements for the certificate
he seeks, the State Board of Examiners correctly denied his application.
Accordingly, the recommended decision of the OAL is adopted as the final
decision in this matter and the instant petition of appeal is hereby dismissed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.1
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION
Date of Decision: January 30, 2012
Date of Mailing: 	January 31, 2012
1 This decision may be appealed to the Appellate Division of the Superior Court pursuant to P.L. 2008, c. 36
(N.J.S.A. 18A:6-9.1)

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.