June 25, 2019- State of New Mexico v. Raymundo Marrufo, Jr., No. A-1-CA-37495

A-1-CA-37495Nmctapp

Open source

Full text

1 	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 	STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
3 	Plaintiff-Appellee,
4 v. 	No. A-1-CA-37495
5 RAYMUNDO MARRUFO, JR.,
6 	Defendant-Appellant.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LUNA COUNTY
8 Jennifer E. DeLaney, District Judge
9 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General
10 	Santa Fe, NM
11 	for Appellee
12 Limon Law Office, LLC
13 	Thomas R.A. Limon
14 Las Cruces, NM
15 	for Appellant
16
17 HANISEE, Judge.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
18 	{1} 	Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of
19 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has
20 been filed and the time for doing so has expireμ. AFFIRMED.
Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Filed 6/25/2019 11:48 AM
·1 {2} 	IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
4 WE CONCUR:
5~~1==-6 ~\TANZI, Judge '
7
8
..
J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
2

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Filed 6/25/2019 11:48 AM

Hn
ark Reynolds

11
12
13
14

15

16

17

18

19

20

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. A-1-CA-37495

RAYMUNDO MARRUFO, JR.,
Defendant-A ppellant.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LUNA COUNTY
Jennifer E. DeLaney, District Judge

Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General
Santa Fe, NM

for Appellee

Limon Law Office, LLC
Thomas R.A. Limon
Las Cruces, NM

for Appellant

MEMORANDUM OPINION
HANISEE, Judge.
{1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of
proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has |

been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED.

1 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
2 3
J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
4 5 6
WE CONCUR:
Juntar Wany.
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
7 Jacqueline R. Medina
8 JACQUELINE R. MEDINA, Judge
2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.