A-1-CA-37713 | Omnilex

Full text

1 	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 	STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
3 	Plaintiff-Appellee,
4 v. 	No. A-1-CA-37713
5 	ISAIAH R.,
6 	Child-Appellant.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF OTERO COUNTY
8 James Waylon Counts, District Judge
9 	Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General
10 	Santa Fe , NM
11 	for Appellee
12 	Limon Law Office, LLC
13 	Thomas R.A. Limon
14 Las Cruces, NM
15 	for Appellant
16
17 VANZI, Judge.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
18 	{1} 	Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of
19 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has
20 	been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED.
Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Filed 5/21/2019 9:37 AM

1 	{2 }
2
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4 	WE CONCUR:
2

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Filed 5/21/2019 9:37 AM

Ah. ~Le4
Mark Reynolds
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STAT™ OF NEW MEXICO

—

2| STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

3 Plaintiff-Appellee,

Allv. No. A-1-CA-37713
S|ISATAH R.,

6 Child-Appellant.

7| APPEAL FROM . HE DISTRICT COURT OF G.eRO COUNTY
8] James Waylon Counts, District Judge

9) Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General
10] Santa Fe, NM

11||for Appellee

12}|Limon Law Office, LLC

13}, .n0mas R.A. Limon

14] ~ as Cruces, NM

15|for Appellant

16 MEMORANDUM OPINION

17] VANZI, Judge.

18]; Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

19} proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has

20|| been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED.

1 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
Lundan Wani
LINDAM. VANZI, Judge
2 3 4 WE CONCUR: 5 Jacqueline R. Medina 6MJACQUELINE'R. MEDINA, Judge
Briana Zamora
7 8 BRIANA H. ZAMORA, Judge
2

May 21, 2019- State of New Mexico v. Isaiah R., No. A-1-CA-37713

Full text

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude